Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction · Massachusetts

Beacon Piping Co. Inc.

Canton, MA · ~70 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Beacon Piping Co. Inc. runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Beacon Piping Co. Inc.: 0.5 TCR = 17% of Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Beacon Piping Co. Inc. safety composite

Beacon Piping Co. Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2016→2024

Beacon Piping Co. Inc. injury rate improved

Beacon Piping Co. Inc.'s TCR fell 2.3 from 2.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.3 · 2017=2.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Canton, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 17% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/31
  • PHOTO Thurston_Potelco
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Thurston_Potelco (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Beacon Piping Co. Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Beacon Piping Co. Inc. averages 0.5 TCR (17% of the Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Beacon Piping Co. Inc. TCR series: 2016=2.3 · 2017=2 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Beacon Piping Co. Inc. falls in its industry

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communicat establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 31 Utility line (i.e., communicat employers in Massachusetts.

Beacon Piping Co. Inc. (70 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Beacon Piping Co. Inc.
Beacon Piping Co. Inc. (70 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Beacon Piping Co. Inc. has fewer employees than the Utility line (i.e., communication, elect median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.0 2.0 2 0 0
2016 2.3 1.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · MA · Canton

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 98 employers in Canton, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Thurston_Potelco 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Debco Construction 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bianchi Electric 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR TESSCO Stanton 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Holland Construction 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Structures Derek International sa 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE EAC 6280 North East Paving 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE JH Lynch & Sons Inc - Millbury 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR Point32Health Canton 4,420 FTE
CITY-NEAR Organogenesis (Campus: 85, 65, and 150 Dan Rd Canton Locations) 855 FTE
CITY-NEAR Organogenesis (Campus: 85, 65, and 150 Dan Rd Canton Location's) 631 FTE
CITY-NEAR E.M. Duggan, Inc. 432 FTE
NAT-TCR Lockheed Martin Littleton 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sh4260 Ranch 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Triland Foods, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Quorum Group dba Takeform 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rogers Group, Inc 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Timber Products - Michigan Sawmill 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hospice of Miami County, Inc. 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Western Hills LLC 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.