Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing · Connecticut

Bead Industries, Inc.

Milford, CT · ~25 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bead Industries, Inc. runs at 295% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Bead Industries, Inc.: 9.7 TCR = 295% of Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bead Industries, Inc. safety composite

Bead Industries, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2023→2024

Bead Industries, Inc. injury rate improved

Bead Industries, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.4 from 11.4 in 2023 to 8.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 11.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=11.4 · 2024=8.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334417 · Milford, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.7 · 295% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/8
  • PHOTO Cinch Connectors Inc.
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cinch Connectors Inc. (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Bead Industries, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bead Industries, Inc. averages 9.7 TCR (295% of the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bead Industries, Inc. TCR series: 2023=11.4 · 2024=8 · BLS 3.3

Where Bead Industries, Inc. falls in its industry

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 8 Connectors, electronic (e.g., employers in Connecticut.

Bead Industries, Inc. (25 employees, TCR 9.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Bead Industries, Inc.
Bead Industries, Inc. (25 employees, TCR 9.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 144 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Bead Industries, Inc. has fewer employees than the Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.0 0.0 2 0 0
2023 11.4 0.0 0 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334417 · CT · Milford

166 Connectors, electronic (e.g., coaxial, cylindrical, printed circuit, rack and panel), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 130 employers in Milford, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cinch Connectors Inc. 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hirel Connectors - Cables (York) 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amphenol Nexus Technologies 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hexatronic Rochester Cable, Inc. 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Woodstock Building Associates, LLC 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE E&N Associates, LLC 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clearheart Construction Company, Inc 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Northeast Companies 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Edgewell 808 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milford Hospital 660 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bridgeport Hospital Milford Campus 559 FTE
CITY-NEAR Edgewell Personal care 526 FTE
NAT-TCR 6 - Brainerd 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Champion Window of Denver 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Policia Municipal 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Liberty Health Care Center 9.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE LUG 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Iron & Steel, Inc. 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mgb Construction, Inc 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE CountyLine Dairy 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.