Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction · California

Beador Construction Company, Inc.

Costa Mesa, CA · ~36 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Beador Construction Company, Inc. runs at 74% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Beador Construction Company, Inc.: 2.1 TCR = 74% of Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Beador Construction Company, Inc. safety composite

Beador Construction Company, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.1

2022→2023

Beador Construction Company, Inc. injury rate improved

Beador Construction Company, Inc.'s TCR fell 4.1 from 4.1 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=4.1 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Costa Mesa, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 74% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #372/551
  • PHOTO Powell Constructors …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Powell Constructors Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Beador Construction Company, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Beador Construction Company, Inc. averages 2.1 TCR (74% of the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Beador Construction Company, Inc. TCR series: 2022=4.1 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Beador Construction Company, Inc. falls in its industry

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, stree establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #372 safest of 551 Pavement, highway, road, stree employers in California.

Beador Construction Company, Inc. (36 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Beador Construction Company, Inc.
Beador Construction Company, Inc. (36 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Beador Construction Company, Inc. has fewer employees than the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.1 4.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · CA · Costa Mesa

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 185 employers in Costa Mesa, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Powell Constructors Inc 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meise Construction Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rae-Lyn Enterprises 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eastern Region 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE River Garden Farms 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Knight Farms 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.H. MEEK & SONS INC. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dirt Farmer and Company 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR PACIFIC AMPHITHEATER 863 FTE
CITY-NEAR OC Fair & Event Center 861 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Costa Mesa 670 FTE
CITY-NEAR PACWEST Security Services 567 FTE
NAT-TCR Green Construction Enterprises 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Knickerbocker Group 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR mini of ramsey 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Altorfer Inc. - Cedar Rapids, IA - 2600 6th Street SW 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Englewood - Logistics 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Layne Glass Company, LLC 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ced/Evansville Supply (Pc2285) 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ced - Greentech (4560) 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.