Electric power distribution systems · Texas

Beaumont Service Center

Beaumont, TX · ~78 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Beaumont Service Center runs at 138% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electric power distribution systems workplace, earning a grade D.

Beaumont Service Center: 1.6 TCR = 138% of Electric power distribution systems BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Beaumont Service Center safety composite

Beaumont Service Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2016→2023

Beaumont Service Center injury rate improved

Beaumont Service Center's TCR fell 1.4 from 2.5 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.5 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Beaumont, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.6 · 138% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #105/246
  • PHOTO SCRSC Scranton Servi…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SCRSC Scranton Service Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Beaumont Service Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Beaumont Service Center averages 1.6 TCR (138% of the Electric power distribution systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Beaumont Service Center TCR series: 2016=2.5 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=1.1 · BLS 1.2

Where Beaumont Service Center falls in its industry

2,958 Electric power distribution sy establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #105 safest of 246 Electric power distribution sy employers in Texas.

Beaumont Service Center (78 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Beaumont Service Center
Beaumont Service Center (78 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Beaumont Service Center has more employees than the Electric power distribution systems median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2022 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.8 2.8 2 0 0
2018 2.9 1.5 1 1 0
2017 2.6 1.3 2 0 0
2016 2.5 1.3 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · TX · Beaumont

2,958 Electric power distribution systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 329 employers in Beaumont, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SCRSC Scranton Service Center 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greenville SC 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chicago Loop Tech 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR CenterPoint Energy - Baytown Service Center 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Americot, Inc 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aim Directional Services, LLC 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ironclad 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE RWE Renewables Services LLC-Roscoe 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR Beaumont SCANfining Project (BMSF) 2,106 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas 2,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4038-1618 1,189 FTE
CITY-NEAR ExxonMobil Beaumont Refinery 1,178 FTE
NAT-TCR Andys Iga 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Campbell 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR AK003 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR CA006 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Trenton Systems, Inc. 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yorba Linda Water District 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE 22043 - Helena 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Old Mill Rehabilitation 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.