Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Oregon

Beaverton Container

Beaverton, OR · ~115 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Beaverton Container runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade B.

Beaverton Container: 1.9 TCR = 59% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Beaverton Container safety composite

Beaverton Container scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2016→2024

Beaverton Container injury rate improved

Beaverton Container's TCR fell 2.3 from 3.1 in 2016 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.1 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=2.5 · 2024=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Beaverton, OR AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 59% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #4/12
  • PHOTO MASCOT (Knoxville), TN
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~115 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MASCOT (Knoxville), TN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Beaverton Container in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Beaverton Container averages 1.9 TCR (59% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Beaverton Container TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=2.5 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Beaverton Container falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 12 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Oregon.

Beaverton Container (115 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Beaverton Container
Beaverton Container (115 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Beaverton Container has more employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2021 2.5 2.5 3 0 0
2020 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2019 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2018 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2017 4.7 3.2 6 0 0
2016 3.1 1.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · OR · Beaverton

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 240 employers in Beaverton, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MASCOT (Knoxville), TN 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4368 Glendale AZ Container 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Royal Box Cicero 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Royal Box 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Goodfellow Bros. LLC - Oregon 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6400-SWY 0045 8111 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE White City EWP - WP 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4366 Portland OR Container 115 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nike World Headquarters 14,796 FTE
CITY-NEAR 004-Nike Air Manufacturing Oregon 1,585 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tailwind (IHM - Beaverton) 1,170 FTE
CITY-NEAR Analog Devices 907 FTE
NAT-TCR State Roofing Systems Inc 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Cable Com, Inc 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR D.W. Mack Co., Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Trident Steel Corporation 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Northern Neck Senior Care Community 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE US Sugar 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Electronic Evolution Technologies, Inc. 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lyntegar Electric Cooperative, Inc 115 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.