Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building · Nebraska

beckenhauerconstruction

Norfolk, NE · ~34 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

beckenhauerconstruction runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade B.

beckenhauerconstruction: 1.7 TCR = 58% of Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

beckenhauerconstruction safety composite

beckenhauerconstruction scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

beckenhauerconstruction: 0.0 → 3.4 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 3.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.99× in 2017

beckenhauerconstruction's TCR rose 3.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.4 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 1.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Norfolk, NE AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 58% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #19/52
  • PHOTO Kotze Construction C…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kotze Construction Co., Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

beckenhauerconstruction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows beckenhauerconstruction averages 1.7 TCR (58% of the Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

beckenhauerconstruction TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3.4 · BLS 2.9

Where beckenhauerconstruction falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 52 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Nebraska.

beckenhauerconstruction (34 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate beckenhauerconstruction
beckenhauerconstruction (34 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

beckenhauerconstruction has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation for- median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · NE · Norfolk

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 87 employers in Norfolk, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kotze Construction Co., Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cox Contractors, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ramirez Contracting Services, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Forest Development, LLC 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE H&R Construction Co 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Omaha - Sampson Construction 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Independent Roofing Company Inc 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE McGill Asbestos Abatement, LLC 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Faith Regional Health Services West Campus 823 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nucor Steel Nebraska 506 FTE
CITY-NEAR AWG, Norfolk 493 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vulcraft Nebraska 460 FTE
NAT-TCR 85- Hake 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR APM Terminals Port Elizabeth 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Oldcastle OPI - Jacksonville 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #0232 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Glenn E. Sessions & Sons 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Haley, Chisholm & Morris, Inc. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Caliber, Inc 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1034 Southern York Co. School District 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.