Containers for packaging, bottling, and canning, glass, manufacturing · Illinois

Bedford Park North

Bedford Park, IL · ~156 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bedford Park North runs at 56% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Containers for packaging, bottling, and canning, glass, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Bedford Park North: 1.9 TCR = 56% of Containers for packaging, bottling, and canning, glass, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bedford Park North safety composite

Bedford Park North scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2016→2022

Bedford Park North injury rate improved

Bedford Park North's TCR fell 1.5 from 2.6 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.6 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=2.0 · 2022=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327213 · Bedford Park, IL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 56% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #1/6
  • PHOTO Owens-Illinois, Inc.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~156 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Owens-Illinois, Inc. (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Bedford Park North in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bedford Park North averages 1.9 TCR (56% of the Containers for packaging, bottling, and canning, glass, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bedford Park North TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=2 · 2022=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Bedford Park North falls in its industry

98 Containers for packaging, bott establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 6 Containers for packaging, bott employers in Illinois.

Bedford Park North (156 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 236 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Bedford Park North
Bedford Park North (156 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 236 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Bedford Park North has fewer employees than the Containers for packaging, bottling, and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.1 0.6 2 0 0
2021 2.0 2.0 3 0 0
2020 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2019 1.1 0.0 0 2 0
2018 2.4 1.2 2 2 0
2017 3.4 1.3 5 0 0
2016 2.6 1.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327213 · IL · Bedford Park

98 Containers for packaging, bottling, and canning, glass, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 140 employers in Bedford Park, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Owens-Illinois, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SCHOTT North America Inc Pharmaceutical Packaging 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ardagh Glass Packaging Inc Houston 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Owens Illinois Brockway Plant 18 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Merit Contractors, LLC 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southside Soapbox 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE Berry Global 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE Advanced Plastic Corporation, Inc. 156 FTE
CITY-NEAR MDWPW9669 MDW - OPS 1,757 FTE
CITY-NEAR ILBED - BEDFORD PARK 1,041 FTE
CITY-NEAR BEDFORD PARK (ILBED) 835 FTE
CITY-NEAR 161546-SOUTH SUBURBAN IL P&DC 834 FTE
NAT-TCR Z&P Builders 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Priority Honda Roanoke 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Granite State Plumbing & Heating 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR MedServe 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1685 Marthaler 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE 9215-AUS 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE 9215-BUR 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE Somerwoods Nursing & Rehabilitation 156 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.