Drug abuse prevention advocacy organizations · California

Behavioral Health Services, Inc.

Gardena, CA · ~58 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Behavioral Health Services, Inc. runs at 303% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Drug abuse prevention advocacy organizations workplace, earning a grade F.

Behavioral Health Services, Inc.: 6.4 TCR = 303% of Drug abuse prevention advocacy organizations BLS 2.1 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Behavioral Health Services, Inc. safety composite

Behavioral Health Services, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2017→2022

Behavioral Health Services, Inc. injury rate improved

Behavioral Health Services, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.2 from 3.1 in 2017 to 1.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 14.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.1 · 2018=14.8 · 2019=6.8 · 2020=5.2 · 2022=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 813319 · Gardena, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.4 · 303% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #10/14
  • PHOTO Corporate
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Corporate (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Behavioral Health Services, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Behavioral Health Services, Inc. averages 6.4 TCR (303% of the Drug abuse prevention advocacy organizations BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Behavioral Health Services, Inc. TCR series: 2017=3.1 · 2018=14.8 · 2019=6.8 · 2020=5.2 · 2022=1.9 · BLS 2.1

Where Behavioral Health Services, Inc. falls in its industry

81 Drug abuse prevention advocacy establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 14 Drug abuse prevention advocacy employers in California.

Behavioral Health Services, Inc. (58 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 147 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Behavioral Health Services, Inc.
Behavioral Health Services, Inc. (58 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 147 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Behavioral Health Services, Inc. has fewer employees than the Drug abuse prevention advocacy organizat median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2020 5.2 1.7 2 1 0
2019 6.8 4.5 3 0 0
2018 14.8 7.4 6 0 0
2017 3.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

813319 · CA · Gardena

81 Drug abuse prevention advocacy organizations employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 223 employers in Gardena, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Corporate 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sandco Industries 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Community Services 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR YMCA in Burnsville 6.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE S & R Farm Labor Contractor 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE RANCHO DEL MAR, INC. 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Laurel Labor Services 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Juan Briones 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 602 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-030 909 FTE
CITY-NEAR GARDENA HUB (CAGAR) 809 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAGAR - GARDENA HUB 794 FTE
NAT-TCR Nymon - Newburgh 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 9123-Jax-Primeflight Aviation Services, Inc. 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR PSSI - 0618 JBS Pilgrim's Moorefield Cook Plant 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Washington Hospital 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ozark Materials LLC 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lynchburg - AOC Metal Works 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE 55356 Tulsa 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG1055 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.