Handicapped, schools for, elementary or secondary · California

Behavioral Heath Works, Ontario, Inc

Montclair, CA · ~106 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Behavioral Heath Works, Ontario, Inc runs at 474% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Handicapped, schools for, elementary or secondary workplace, earning a grade F.

Behavioral Heath Works, Ontario, Inc: 6.6 TCR = 474% of Handicapped, schools for, elementary or secondary BLS 1.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Behavioral Heath Works, Ontario, Inc safety composite

Behavioral Heath Works, Ontario, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Behavioral Heath Works, Ontario, Inc: 5.0 → 8.3 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 8.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.75× in 2019

Behavioral Heath Works, Ontario, Inc's TCR rose 3.4 from 5.0 in 2018 to 8.3 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 611110 · Montclair, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.6 · 474% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #28/63
  • PHOTO Jefferson School Dis…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~106 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jefferson School District 14J (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Behavioral Heath Works, Ontario, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Behavioral Heath Works, Ontario, Inc averages 6.6 TCR (474% of the Handicapped, schools for, elementary or secondary BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Behavioral Heath Works, Ontario, Inc TCR series: 2018=5 · 2019=8.3 · BLS 1.4

Where Behavioral Heath Works, Ontario, Inc falls in its industry

3,374 Handicapped, schools for, elem establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 63 Handicapped, schools for, elem employers in California.

Behavioral Heath Works, Ontario, Inc (106 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Behavioral Heath Works, Ontario, Inc
Behavioral Heath Works, Ontario, Inc (106 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Behavioral Heath Works, Ontario, Inc has more employees than the Handicapped, schools for, elementary or median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 8.3 5.0 4 1 0
2018 5.0 1.6 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

611110 · CA · Montclair

3,374 Handicapped, schools for, elementary or secondary employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 41 employers in Montclair, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jefferson School District 14J 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Middle School 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ISD #550 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Abraham Lincoln Elementary School 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE D & J Farm Management LLC 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Robinson Calf Ranch 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monte Vista Farming Company LLC. 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Empire Farm Labor Contracting, Inc 106 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hampton Tedder Electric 429 FTE
CITY-NEAR Montclair Hospital Medical Hospital 388 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0686 - MONTCLAIR CA WHSE 300 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. George Auto Sales, INC 300 FTE
NAT-TCR 4769-765-Pottery Barn Kids 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 4769-339-Pottery Barn 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Victory Packaging Dallas 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Wehmeier Painting, Inc. 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Atlantic Tool & Die SEVILLE 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Champaign, IL 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southwire Company Avon Lake 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Texstar - Selma 106 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.