Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Colorado

Belmont Lodge Health Care Center

Pueblo, CO · ~80 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
11.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Belmont Lodge Health Care Center runs at 170% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade D.

Belmont Lodge Health Care Center: 11.0 TCR = 170% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Belmont Lodge Health Care Center safety composite

Belmont Lodge Health Care Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Belmont Lodge Health Care Center: 8.7 → 13.3 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 13.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.94× in 2017

Belmont Lodge Health Care Center's TCR rose 4.6 from 8.7 in 2016 to 13.3 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0.94× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Pueblo, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 11.0 · 170% of ind

  • DART 10.3 DART
  • RANK #172/259
  • PHOTO Craighead Nursing Ce…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~80 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Craighead Nursing Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Belmont Lodge Health Care Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Belmont Lodge Health Care Center averages 11.0 TCR (170% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Belmont Lodge Health Care Center TCR series: 2016=8.7 · 2017=13.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Belmont Lodge Health Care Center falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #172 safest of 259 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Colorado.

Belmont Lodge Health Care Center (80 employees, TCR 11.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Belmont Lodge Health Care Center
Belmont Lodge Health Care Center (80 employees, TCR 11.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Belmont Lodge Health Care Center has fewer employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 13.3 10.3 9 0 0
2016 8.7 0.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CO · Pueblo

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 209 employers in Pueblo, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Craighead Nursing Center 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marysville Care Center 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northern Neck Senior Care Community 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alden Estates of Naperville 11.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Yampa Valley Electric Association 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arlun Inc 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri Pointe Homes Colorado 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Integrated Water Services, Inc. 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parkview Medical Center 2,463 FTE
CITY-NEAR Parkview Health System 2,367 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Mary-Corwin Medical Center 1,451 FTE
CITY-NEAR EVRAZ Pueblo 1,128 FTE
NAT-TCR Advanced Disposal - CGS 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 121 ABC Supply Co., Inc 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Jefferson Parish 12483 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Maryville 11.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Excelsior Springs Nursing and Rehab LLC 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1730 LKQ/Keystone 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Communications Specialists, Inc. 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlantic Spring 80 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.