Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Georgia

Belmont Village Buckhead

Atlanta, GA · ~63 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Belmont Village Buckhead runs at 113% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Belmont Village Buckhead: 4.3 TCR = 113% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Belmont Village Buckhead safety composite

Belmont Village Buckhead scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 4.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2024

Belmont Village Buckhead injury rate improved

Belmont Village Buckhead's TCR fell 0.5 from 3.4 in 2016 to 2.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 14.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.4 · 2017=14.8 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.0 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Atlanta, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.3 · 113% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #23/77
  • PHOTO Lutheran Homes of Oc…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lutheran Homes of Oconomowoc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Belmont Village Buckhead in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Belmont Village Buckhead averages 4.3 TCR (113% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Belmont Village Buckhead TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=14.8 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=0 · 2022=2 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Belmont Village Buckhead falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 77 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Georgia.

Belmont Village Buckhead (63 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Belmont Village Buckhead
Belmont Village Buckhead (63 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Belmont Village Buckhead has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2023 4.3 4.3 2 0 0
2022 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2019 4.7 3.1 3 0 0
2018 4.3 2.9 3 0 0
2017 14.8 10.7 11 0 0
2016 3.4 1.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · GA · Atlanta

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lutheran Homes of Oconomowoc 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brook Ridge 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Westlake Village 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACTS Retirement-Life Communities-Gwynedd Estates 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services - Bethune, SC 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plant Yates 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Athens Operating - 205 Dairy Pac Rd. Athens 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rockford 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR Pipe of Washington DBA POW Contracting 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Fire Department 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR HyPro Inc. Vinita (VN) 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Pratt (Quality Carton), LLC 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Corporate 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Logistec USA / Cleveland Breakbulk 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avon Nursing Home, LLC 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE NNAC, Inc. 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.