Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · California

Belmont Village Encino

Sherman Oaks, CA · ~132 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Belmont Village Encino runs at 320% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Belmont Village Encino: 12.2 TCR = 320% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Belmont Village Encino safety composite

Belmont Village Encino scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Belmont Village Encino: 7.5 → 15.0 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 24.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.88× in 2024

Belmont Village Encino's TCR rose 7.5 from 7.5 in 2018 to 15.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 24.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.88× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Sherman Oaks, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 12.2 · 320% of ind

  • DART 10.7 DART
  • RANK #150/216
  • PHOTO Silverado Newport Me…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 81 inj
  • SIZE ~132 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Silverado Newport Mesa - 221 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Belmont Village Encino in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Belmont Village Encino averages 12.2 TCR (320% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Belmont Village Encino TCR series: 2018=7.5 · 2019=9.7 · 2020=5.6 · 2021=24.1 · 2022=11.5 · 2023=11.8 · 2024=15 · BLS 3.8

Where Belmont Village Encino falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #150 safest of 216 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Belmont Village Encino (132 employees, TCR 12.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Belmont Village Encino
Belmont Village Encino (132 employees, TCR 12.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Belmont Village Encino has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 15.0 10.7 14 0 0
2023 11.8 7.5 11 0 0
2022 11.5 6.4 9 0 0
2021 24.1 17.7 19 0 0
2020 5.6 2.4 6 1 1
2019 9.7 6.7 13 0 0
2018 7.5 5.0 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CA · Sherman Oaks

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 47 employers in Sherman Oaks, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Silverado Newport Mesa - 221 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wheatland Village 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR PHS - The Farmstead 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mattison Crossing at Manalapan Ave Brookside 12.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Midnight Harvest 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE JOHNSTON FARMS 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Irigoyen Farms, Inc. 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri Pointe Homes Orange County-Los Angeles 132 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sherman Oaks Fashion Square 501 500 FTE
CITY-NEAR IMT Residential 464 FTE
CITY-NEAR 71501 290 FTE
CITY-NEAR 72029 243 FTE
NAT-TCR Police Department 12.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Rafn Company 12.2 TCR
NAT-TCR COD022 12.2 TCR
NAT-TCR JOB Erection & Engineering, Inc 12.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Maricopa County - Legal Advocate (550) 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Tex Trucking, LLC 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baker Distributing North 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE LCCP 132 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.