Film, plastics, packaging, manufacturing · Wisconsin

Bemis Healthcare Packaging - New London

New London, WI · ~117 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bemis Healthcare Packaging - New London runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Film, plastics, packaging, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Bemis Healthcare Packaging - New London: 2.2 TCR = 68% of Film, plastics, packaging, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bemis Healthcare Packaging - New London safety composite

Bemis Healthcare Packaging - New London scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2016→2018

Bemis Healthcare Packaging - New London injury rate improved

Bemis Healthcare Packaging - New London's TCR fell 2.6 from 3.4 in 2016 to 0.8 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.4 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.4 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326112 · New London, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 68% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #27/50
  • PHOTO Berry Global
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~117 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Berry Global (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Bemis Healthcare Packaging - New London in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bemis Healthcare Packaging - New London averages 2.2 TCR (68% of the Film, plastics, packaging, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bemis Healthcare Packaging - New London TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=0.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Bemis Healthcare Packaging - New London falls in its industry

396 Film, plastics, packaging, man establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 50 Film, plastics, packaging, man employers in Wisconsin.

Bemis Healthcare Packaging - New London (117 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 90 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Bemis Healthcare Packaging - New London
Bemis Healthcare Packaging - New London (117 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 90 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Bemis Healthcare Packaging - New London has more employees than the Film, plastics, packaging, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2017 2.5 0.8 3 0 0
2016 3.4 1.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326112 · WI · New London

396 Film, plastics, packaging, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 31 employers in New London, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Berry Global 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Taghleef Industries, Inc 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR rose plastic USA LLLP 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tekni Plex Madison 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gumz Muck Farms, LLC 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michels Power- Brownsville 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vita Plus Corporation 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE UFPI/ Universal Ventures II 117 FTE
CITY-NEAR New London Plant 817 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bemis North America - New London 550 FTE
CITY-NEAR Curwood Inc 443 FTE
CITY-NEAR ThedaCare Medical Center New London 237 FTE
NAT-TCR Nancy N and JC Lewis Cancer Pavilion 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR NC State University 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR SBA Communications Corporation 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Ventura Foods, SALEM 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Co 17 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tony's Finer Foods-467 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Florida West Coast Symphony Inc. d/b/a Sarasota Orchestra 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Airland Government Services 117 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.