Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · New Jersey

Benchmark-CNJ

Branchburg, NJ · ~157 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Benchmark-CNJ runs at 69% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Benchmark-CNJ: 2.6 TCR = 69% of Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Benchmark-CNJ safety composite

Benchmark-CNJ scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2018→2022

Benchmark-CNJ injury rate improved

Benchmark-CNJ's TCR fell 1.7 from 2.5 in 2018 to 0.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.5 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Branchburg, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 69% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #8/38
  • PHOTO Social Vocational Se…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~157 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Social Vocational Services 264 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Benchmark-CNJ in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Benchmark-CNJ averages 2.6 TCR (69% of the Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Benchmark-CNJ TCR series: 2018=2.5 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=0.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Benchmark-CNJ falls in its industry

1,320 Companion services for disable establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 38 Companion services for disable employers in New Jersey.

Benchmark-CNJ (157 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Benchmark-CNJ
Benchmark-CNJ (157 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Benchmark-CNJ has more employees than the Companion services for disabled persons, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2021 2.4 0.8 2 1 0
2020 4.8 3.2 6 0 0
2019 2.5 1.7 3 0 0
2018 2.5 1.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · NJ · Branchburg

1,320 Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 47 employers in Branchburg, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Social Vocational Services 264 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR PHC - Circleville 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR PATHWAYS, INC. 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allegheny 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Trevcon Construction Co. LLC 157 FTE
STATE-SIZE Universal Synergetics, Inc. dba T.H.E.M. of New Jersey 157 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allendale 157 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stone Source LLC 157 FTE
CITY-NEAR Roche Molecular Solutions (Main) 1,038 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ferreira Construction Co. Inc. 833 FTE
CITY-NEAR Roche Molecular Systems Branchburg Site 742 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Branchburg 595 FTE
NAT-TCR 44933 - Tampa Fac. 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Delphos 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bed Bath and Beyond Woodlands 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR American Veteran Solutions, Inc 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rye Service Center 157 FTE
NAT-SIZE Truss Fab 157 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZENG 157 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZSLM 157 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.