Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · Montana

Benchmark-MT

Helena, MT · ~64 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Benchmark-MT runs at 488% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Benchmark-MT: 18.6 TCR = 488% of Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Benchmark-MT safety composite

Benchmark-MT scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.5

2016→2022

Benchmark-MT injury rate improved

Benchmark-MT's TCR fell 9.5 from 15.6 in 2016 to 6.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 36.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=15.6 · 2017=15.6 · 2018=9.9 · 2019=30.6 · 2020=36.9 · 2021=15.4 · 2022=6.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Helena, MT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.6 · 488% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P3
  • PHOTO Gardner Day Habiitat…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gardner Day Habiitation Program (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Montana employers → · Look up another →

Benchmark-MT in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Benchmark-MT averages 18.6 TCR (488% of the Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Benchmark-MT TCR series: 2016=15.6 · 2017=15.6 · 2018=9.9 · 2019=30.6 · 2020=36.9 · 2021=15.4 · 2022=6.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Benchmark-MT falls in its industry

1,320 Companion services for disable establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Benchmark-MT (64 employees, TCR 18.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Benchmark-MT
Benchmark-MT (64 employees, TCR 18.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Benchmark-MT has fewer employees than the Companion services for disabled persons, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.1 0.0 2 0 0
2021 15.4 6.6 7 0 0
2020 36.9 32.2 10 6 0
2019 30.6 17.8 12 0 0
2018 9.9 0.0 4 0 0
2017 15.6 6.2 5 0 0
2016 15.6 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · MT · Helena

1,320 Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,536 rated employers in Montana with headcount on file · 98 employers in Helena, MT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gardner Day Habiitation Program 18.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR United Cerebral Palsy of Georgia-Conyers Day 18.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Easter Seals Hawaii - Autism Services 18.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES - SAN BERNARDINO 18.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE International Towers, LLC 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Askin Construction LLC 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spligitty Fiber Optics, Inc. 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stevensville, MT 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dick Anderson Construction 399 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1872 377 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1872 349 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rocky Mountain Contractors, Main Office 265 FTE
NAT-TCR 1202 - NLCM Capitola 18.6 TCR
NAT-TCR OR-Exley RC 18.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Salem Outlet 18.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Siegfried's Basement LLC 18.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Public Restroom Company 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Whittier Place Senior Living 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE VSL Allen, LLC 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Westpark A Waters Community 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.