Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · New Jersey

Benchmark-SNJ

Vineland, NJ · ~115 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Benchmark-SNJ runs at 64% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Benchmark-SNJ: 2.4 TCR = 64% of Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Benchmark-SNJ safety composite

Benchmark-SNJ scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Benchmark-SNJ held a steady TCR band

Benchmark-SNJ's TCR held near 0.0 from 2.4 in 2016 to 2.4 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.4 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.4 · 2017=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Vineland, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 64% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/38
  • PHOTO Bethany Home Care, I…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~115 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bethany Home Care, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Benchmark-SNJ in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Benchmark-SNJ averages 2.4 TCR (64% of the Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Benchmark-SNJ TCR series: 2016=2.4 · 2017=2.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Benchmark-SNJ falls in its industry

1,320 Companion services for disable establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 38 Companion services for disable employers in New Jersey.

Benchmark-SNJ (115 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Benchmark-SNJ
Benchmark-SNJ (115 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Benchmark-SNJ has more employees than the Companion services for disabled persons, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 2.4 0.0 2 0 0
2016 2.4 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · NJ · Vineland

1,320 Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 129 employers in Vineland, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bethany Home Care, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Feather River Opportunity Center 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Diversified Human Services, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Centerlight Healthcare Stillwell 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE P & B Partitions, Inc. 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE TFH Publications Nylabone Products 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aunt Kittys Foods 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Danone 115 FTE
CITY-NEAR F&S Fresh Foods 1,166 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3339 434 FTE
CITY-NEAR AJM Packaging - Vineland 418 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3339 414 FTE
NAT-TCR Alliance (Txfth) 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Kautaq Construction Services, LLC 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Cleveland OH HCS at Home 90-43-63-12 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR dd's DISCOUNTS Store 5290 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Decatur County Health Care and Rehabilitation, Inc. 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avante at Wilson 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manchester Tank Crossville 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sulphur Springs (Txsul) 115 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.