Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · Ohio

Benchmark-St M

St. Mary'S, OH · ~141 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Benchmark-St M runs at 136% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Benchmark-St M: 5.2 TCR = 136% of Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Benchmark-St M safety composite

Benchmark-St M scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Benchmark-St M held a steady TCR band

Benchmark-St M's TCR held near 0.3 from 3.0 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 12.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.0 · 2017=12.3 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=8.4 · 2020=2.0 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · St. Mary'S, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 136% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #31/40
  • PHOTO East Arkansas Area A…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~141 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: East Arkansas Area Agency on Aging- Cross (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Benchmark-St M in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Benchmark-St M averages 5.2 TCR (136% of the Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Benchmark-St M TCR series: 2016=3 · 2017=12.3 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=8.4 · 2020=2 · 2021=3.9 · 2022=2.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Benchmark-St M falls in its industry

1,320 Companion services for disable establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 40 Companion services for disable employers in Ohio.

Benchmark-St M (141 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Benchmark-St M
Benchmark-St M (141 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Benchmark-St M has more employees than the Companion services for disabled persons, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.7 2.7 3 0 0
2021 3.9 1.0 4 0 0
2020 2.0 2.0 2 0 0
2019 8.4 3.1 8 0 0
2018 3.9 3.9 4 0 0
2017 12.3 5.7 13 0 0
2016 3.0 2.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · OH · St. Mary'S

1,320 Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 3 employers in St. Mary'S, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR East Arkansas Area Agency on Aging- Cross 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR SpiriTrust Lutheran LIFE Franklin 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oppenheim Day Hab 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Home Care 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corporate Office 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE Delaware Container 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE Franklin 141 FTE
STATE-SIZE Novagard Solutions LLC 141 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1425 - St. Marys 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR OmniSource LLC - St. Mary's 28 FTE
NAT-TCR SEABOX Hillsborough 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 0738 - Cave Creek Az Whse 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Rosen Inn at Pointe Orlando 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Milton C. Beebe & Sons, Inc. 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Creation Technologies Texas 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZMEM 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZTOP 141 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZWLG 141 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.