Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Wisconsin

Benevolent Cedar Community - Elkhart Lake

Elkhart Lake, WI · ~40 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Benevolent Cedar Community - Elkhart Lake runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Benevolent Cedar Community - Elkhart Lake: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Benevolent Cedar Community - Elkhart Lake safety composite

Benevolent Cedar Community - Elkhart Lake scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

83/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Benevolent Cedar Community - Elkhart Lake held a steady TCR band

Benevolent Cedar Community - Elkhart Lake's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 0.0 TCR.

2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Elkhart Lake, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/171
  • PHOTO PHS - GracePointe Cr…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PHS - GracePointe Crossing Commons (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Benevolent Cedar Community - Elkhart Lake in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Benevolent Cedar Community - Elkhart Lake averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Benevolent Cedar Community - Elkhart Lake TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Benevolent Cedar Community - Elkhart Lake falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 171 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Wisconsin.

Benevolent Cedar Community - Elkhart Lake (40 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Benevolent Cedar Community - Elkhart Lake
Benevolent Cedar Community - Elkhart Lake (40 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Benevolent Cedar Community - Elkhart Lake has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · WI · Elkhart Lake

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 10 employers in Elkhart Lake, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PHS - GracePointe Crossing Commons 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Antebellum James Burgess 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Senior Living 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Briarwood Manor Inc. 0.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Washburn Iron Works. Inc. 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE WI029SRM 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE EMPIRE BUCKET INC 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wenger Roofing, Siding and Sheet Metal 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR R and D / Engineering : Elkhart Lake 92 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bremer Manufacturing Company, Inc. 89 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elkhart Lake 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5935_12921 68 FTE
NAT-TCR Gap Inc. - Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta - Phipps 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer 208 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Binghamton 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ryan Plumbing, Heating, A/C & Fire Protection 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE D&D Distributing 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Red Mountain Truck Lines Inc 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metal Seal Precision, Ltd - Plant 1 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.