Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals and metal products for the trade · New Jersey

Bennett Heat Treating and Brazing

Newark, NJ · ~46 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bennett Heat Treating and Brazing runs at 202% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade F.

Bennett Heat Treating and Brazing: 6.7 TCR = 202% of Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bennett Heat Treating and Brazing safety composite

Bennett Heat Treating and Brazing scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2016→2024

Bennett Heat Treating and Brazing injury rate improved

Bennett Heat Treating and Brazing's TCR fell 1.5 from 8.2 in 2016 to 6.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 11.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.2 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=6.3 · 2022=5.8 · 2023=11.3 · 2024=6.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332811 · Newark, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.7 · 202% of ind

  • DART 6.6 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Engineered Heat Trea…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Engineered Heat Treat, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Bennett Heat Treating and Brazing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bennett Heat Treating and Brazing averages 6.7 TCR (202% of the Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bennett Heat Treating and Brazing TCR series: 2016=8.2 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=6.3 · 2022=5.8 · 2023=11.3 · 2024=6.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Bennett Heat Treating and Brazing falls in its industry

248 Hardening (i.e., heat treating establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Hardening (i.e., heat treating employers in New Jersey.

Bennett Heat Treating and Brazing (46 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Bennett Heat Treating and Brazing
Bennett Heat Treating and Brazing (46 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Bennett Heat Treating and Brazing has more employees than the Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals a median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.6 6.6 2 0 0
2023 11.3 9.0 5 0 0
2022 5.8 5.8 2 0 0
2021 6.3 4.2 3 0 0
2020 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2016 8.2 6.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332811 · NJ · Newark

248 Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 356 employers in Newark, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Engineered Heat Treat, LLC 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Accurate Steel Treating, Inc. 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR FPM Heat Treating - Elk Grove Village 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precision Heat Treating Corporation 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Holland Greenhouses Inc. 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE WATERFORD 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Jersey American Water - Monmouth Production 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE NJ Division Freehold 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWR EWR 13,545 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWR - Airport United Airlines Offices 13,015 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-EWR 11,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWRPW9829 EWR - NON AA PAX SER 4,772 FTE
NAT-TCR Fulton Iron & Manufacturing LLC 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Bonney Forge 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Location 37 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Dc 6100 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE RI 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE 005/Austin 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Do-All, Inc. 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Farmers Supply Company of Marvell, Inc. 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.