Distribution of electric power · Washington

Benton Rural Electric Association

Prosser, WA · ~73 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Benton Rural Electric Association runs at 519% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Benton Rural Electric Association: 6.2 TCR = 519% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Benton Rural Electric Association safety composite

Benton Rural Electric Association scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Benton Rural Electric Association: 4.7 → 5.9 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 16.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.47× in 2023

Benton Rural Electric Association's TCR rose 1.2 from 4.7 in 2018 to 5.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 16.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Prosser, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.2 · 519% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #24/30
  • PHOTO West LA Station Main…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: West LA Station Maintenance (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Benton Rural Electric Association in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Benton Rural Electric Association averages 6.2 TCR (519% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Benton Rural Electric Association TCR series: 2018=4.7 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=7.6 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=16.3 · 2023=5.9 · BLS 1.2

Where Benton Rural Electric Association falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 30 Distribution of electric power employers in Washington.

Benton Rural Electric Association (73 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Benton Rural Electric Association
Benton Rural Electric Association (73 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Benton Rural Electric Association has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.9 3.0 4 0 0
2022 16.3 16.3 8 3 0
2021 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2020 7.6 6.1 5 0 0
2019 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2018 4.7 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · WA · Prosser

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 23 employers in Prosser, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR West LA Station Maintenance 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR HANOVER-MA12 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Statesboro Operating 111 Stockyard Rd 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CENTRAL DISTRICT - POWER 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE F/T Araho 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE F/T Alaska Spirit 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Burton Construction Inc 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Universal/Land Construction Co. 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prosser Memorial Health 350 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oasis Farm's Inc. 183 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milne Fruit Products, Inc. 162 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sunset Produce, LLC 129 FTE
NAT-TCR Feldman Brothers Electrical Supply Co, Inc 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Crosby High School 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR The Clark Manor House 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital - The Woodlands 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Glorioso's Italian Market 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Savannah Ports 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Payroll Direct, Inc 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bausum & Duckett Electric LLc 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.