Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) · California

Bert E. Jessup Transportation, Inc.

Gilroy, CA · ~43 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bert E. Jessup Transportation, Inc. runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) workplace, earning a grade A.

Bert E. Jessup Transportation, Inc.: 2.0 TCR = 44% of Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bert E. Jessup Transportation, Inc. safety composite

Bert E. Jessup Transportation, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.8

2017→2023

Bert E. Jessup Transportation, Inc. injury rate improved

Bert E. Jessup Transportation, Inc.'s TCR fell 4.8 from 4.8 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.8 · 2018=3.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484122 · Gilroy, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.0 · 44% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #18/273
  • PHOTO Parsipanny
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Parsipanny (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Bert E. Jessup Transportation, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bert E. Jessup Transportation, Inc. averages 2.0 TCR (44% of the Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bert E. Jessup Transportation, Inc. TCR series: 2017=4.8 · 2018=3.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Bert E. Jessup Transportation, Inc. falls in its industry

3,020 Trucking, general freight, lon establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 273 Trucking, general freight, lon employers in California.

Bert E. Jessup Transportation, Inc. (43 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Bert E. Jessup Transportation, Inc.
Bert E. Jessup Transportation, Inc. (43 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Bert E. Jessup Transportation, Inc. has fewer employees than the Trucking, general freight, long-distance median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2017 4.8 4.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484122 · CA · Gilroy

3,020 Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 113 employers in Gilroy, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Parsipanny 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR IN-Indianapolis-324-YRC Freight 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harlingen TX FXFE-HRL 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR DAY 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Robert & Sandra Garcia Farming Partnership 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE ARVIN ADMINISTRATION 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Donald W Beeman 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE KG Vineyard Management, LLC 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 9 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Christopher Ranch LLC 660 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0010-00100005 475 FTE
CITY-NEAR Olam West Coast 450 FTE
NAT-TCR Rolls-Royce Defense Services NASK 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR DATTCO - Durham 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Winco Fireworks International, LLC - Warehouse 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Federal Cartridge Company 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Honolulu Buick Gmc Cadillac 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rolls-Royce Defense Services NASM 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE 8400 Distribution Koch Foods of AL 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nam Dae Mun Farmers Market West Smyrna 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.