Residential construction, single-family, general contractors · Wisconsin

Best Built, Inc.

Green Bay, WI · ~25 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Best Built, Inc. runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Residential construction, single-family, general contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

Best Built, Inc.: 2.3 TCR = 60% of Residential construction, single-family, general contractors BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Best Built, Inc. safety composite

Best Built, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2024

Best Built, Inc. injury rate improved

Best Built, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.4 from 8.5 in 2016 to 8.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 3.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.5 · 2017=3.8 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=8.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236115 · Green Bay, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 60% of ind

  • DART 8.1 DART
  • RANK #3/23
  • PHOTO DPR Construction - R…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DPR Construction - Richmond (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Best Built, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Best Built, Inc. averages 2.3 TCR (60% of the Residential construction, single-family, general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Best Built, Inc. TCR series: 2016=8.5 · 2017=3.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=8.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Best Built, Inc. falls in its industry

976 Residential construction, sing establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 23 Residential construction, sing employers in Wisconsin.

Best Built, Inc. (25 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Best Built, Inc.
Best Built, Inc. (25 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Best Built, Inc. has fewer employees than the Residential construction, single-family, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.1 8.1 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.8 0.0 1 0 0
2016 8.5 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236115 · WI · Green Bay

976 Residential construction, single-family, general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 563 employers in Green Bay, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DPR Construction - Richmond 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Montaine 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cullum Homes 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR MEID Construction LLC 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fergusons Minnesota Harvest LLC 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minocqua Service Center 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Janesville Headquarters 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Berlin Office 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR WI005 - WI-Green Bay-CSBC 3,595 FTE
CITY-NEAR WI-Green Bay-CSBC 3,296 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital Campus 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR 300000170855522 - WI-Green Bay-CSBC 2,379 FTE
NAT-TCR National Distribution Centers LLC-2000 N. 62nd Street 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR JBEC 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Davenport 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Peachtree City 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE CFE Rock Valley 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Distribution Centers LLC-1431 Vultee Blvd 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Armour Drive 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Asheville 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.