Substation and switching station, power transmission line, construction · California

BETA Engineering California, LP

San Diego, CA · ~23 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

BETA Engineering California, LP runs at 23% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Substation and switching station, power transmission line, construction workplace, earning a grade A.

BETA Engineering California, LP: 0.6 TCR = 23% of Substation and switching station, power transmission line, construction BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

BETA Engineering California, LP safety composite

BETA Engineering California, LP scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

BETA Engineering California, LP held a steady TCR band

BETA Engineering California, LP's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=4.4 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · San Diego, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 23% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #16/147
  • PHOTO Terrasmart LLC
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Terrasmart LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

BETA Engineering California, LP in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows BETA Engineering California, LP averages 0.6 TCR (23% of the Substation and switching station, power transmission line, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

BETA Engineering California, LP TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=4.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where BETA Engineering California, LP falls in its industry

1,605 Substation and switching stati establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 147 Substation and switching stati employers in California.

BETA Engineering California, LP (23 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate BETA Engineering California, LP
BETA Engineering California, LP (23 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

BETA Engineering California, LP has fewer employees than the Substation and switching station, power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.4 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · CA · San Diego

1,605 Substation and switching station, power transmission line, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,979 employers in San Diego, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Terrasmart LLC 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Michels Power Inc-TX-Lubbock 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Power Crystal River Plant 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wanzek Construction 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE James Diedrich Farms 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-Fanucchi Farms,LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE KAN2 - 04 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kyer Farms 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Diego Health 9,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Atomics 8,108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health Human Services Agency 6,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR National University 4,955 FTE
NAT-TCR WHH Horse Hollow 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 7022173 - Pantex HESE 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR MO_Kansas City_6550 Winchester Ave_0AKC9400 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR RM Beverage Distributors 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Basalite - Redmond 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oasis 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Memphis 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4023 Lackawanna College 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.