Badges, metal, manufacturing · Massachusetts

Bete Fog Nozzle, Inc.

Greenfield, MA · ~180 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bete Fog Nozzle, Inc. runs at 131% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Badges, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Bete Fog Nozzle, Inc.: 4.3 TCR = 131% of Badges, metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bete Fog Nozzle, Inc. safety composite

Bete Fog Nozzle, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2016→2024

Bete Fog Nozzle, Inc. injury rate improved

Bete Fog Nozzle, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.3 from 5.3 in 2016 to 4.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.3 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=6.6 · 2020=5.6 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332999 · Greenfield, MA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 131% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #13/18
  • PHOTO Wasatch Fab and Mach…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 53 inj
  • SIZE ~180 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wasatch Fab and Machine (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Bete Fog Nozzle, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bete Fog Nozzle, Inc. averages 4.3 TCR (131% of the Badges, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bete Fog Nozzle, Inc. TCR series: 2016=5.3 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=6.6 · 2020=5.6 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=4 · BLS 3.3

Where Bete Fog Nozzle, Inc. falls in its industry

827 Badges, metal, manufacturing establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 18 Badges, metal, manufacturing employers in Massachusetts.

Bete Fog Nozzle, Inc. (180 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Bete Fog Nozzle, Inc.
Bete Fog Nozzle, Inc. (180 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Bete Fog Nozzle, Inc. has more employees than the Badges, metal, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 1.4 6 0 0
2023 1.1 1.1 2 0 0
2022 3.3 3.3 5 0 0
2021 3.4 1.4 5 0 0
2020 5.6 1.1 10 0 0
2019 6.6 6.6 11 0 0
2018 5.2 1.9 7 1 0
2016 5.3 1.5 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332999 · MA · Greenfield

827 Badges, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 37 employers in Greenfield, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wasatch Fab and Machine 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Penny Plate - Missouri 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Consolidated Steel, Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR PCX Holding, LLC, wholly owned subsid of Hubbell Industrial Controls, Clayton, NC 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rich Products Salem 180 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allegro MicroSystems, LLC (MAR) 180 FTE
STATE-SIZE MANHEIM NEW ENGLAND 180 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sirtex Medical Inc. 180 FTE
CITY-NEAR BFMC - Baystate Franklin Medical Center 726 FTE
CITY-NEAR FMC - Baystate Franklin Medical Center 722 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWM - Greenfield, MA 265 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWM Intl. 261 FTE
NAT-TCR Kruck Plumbing and Heating Co, Inc 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Franklin Wi - One World 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Manno Electric, Inc. 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Peerless Saw Company 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Schamber Electric 180 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wohlsen Construction - Pennsylvania 180 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hoffman Transportation Channahon 180 FTE
NAT-SIZE Town of Ledyard 180 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.