Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Texas

Bethesda Gardens Ft Worth

Ft Worth, TX · ~84 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bethesda Gardens Ft Worth runs at 383% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Bethesda Gardens Ft Worth: 14.6 TCR = 383% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bethesda Gardens Ft Worth safety composite

Bethesda Gardens Ft Worth scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bethesda Gardens Ft Worth: 4.5 → 13.7 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 40.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Bethesda Gardens Ft Worth's TCR rose 9.2 from 4.5 in 2018 to 13.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 40.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Ft Worth, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.6 · 383% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #434/470
  • PHOTO Anthology of Town & …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~84 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Anthology of Town & Country (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Bethesda Gardens Ft Worth in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bethesda Gardens Ft Worth averages 14.6 TCR (383% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bethesda Gardens Ft Worth TCR series: 2018=4.5 · 2019=40.4 · 2020=4.4 · 2021=15.6 · 2022=14.2 · 2023=9.2 · 2024=13.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Bethesda Gardens Ft Worth falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #434 safest of 470 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Texas.

Bethesda Gardens Ft Worth (84 employees, TCR 14.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Bethesda Gardens Ft Worth
Bethesda Gardens Ft Worth (84 employees, TCR 14.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Bethesda Gardens Ft Worth has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 13.7 0.0 1 8 0
2023 9.2 0.0 4 2 0
2022 14.2 0.0 1 9 0
2021 15.6 2.8 7 4 0
2020 4.4 2.9 3 0 0
2019 40.4 10.1 8 20 0
2018 4.5 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · TX · Ft Worth

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 63 employers in Ft Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Anthology of Town & Country 14.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Village at Alameda (ALF) 14.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale River Valley Tualatin 14.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oswego Place Assisted Living Community LLC 14.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE RGJC 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Burnett Ranches 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE USA Feedyard LP 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE FARMERS BRANCH OFFICE 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR INDEPENDENCE HUB (TXFOR) 1,655 FTE
CITY-NEAR TXFOR - INDEPENDENCE HUB 1,540 FTE
CITY-NEAR Central Office 925 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-ZNFW 665 FTE
NAT-TCR Broken Bow Plant 14.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0769 Jacksonville 14.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 1231 Second St - Recycling 14.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0695 Des Peres 14.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Maintenance Facility 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Myron L Company 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dandelion Chocolate 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE CES-Colton 84 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.