Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Indiana

Bethesda Gardens, Terre Haute

Terre Haute, IN · ~30 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bethesda Gardens, Terre Haute runs at 259% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Bethesda Gardens, Terre Haute: 9.8 TCR = 259% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bethesda Gardens, Terre Haute safety composite

Bethesda Gardens, Terre Haute scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2018→2020

Bethesda Gardens, Terre Haute injury rate improved

Bethesda Gardens, Terre Haute's TCR fell 3.3 from 12.6 in 2018 to 9.2 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 12.6 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=12.6 · 2019=7.7 · 2020=9.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Terre Haute, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.8 · 259% of ind

  • DART 4.6 DART
  • RANK #106/133
  • PHOTO Brenden Gardens
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brenden Gardens (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Bethesda Gardens, Terre Haute in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bethesda Gardens, Terre Haute averages 9.8 TCR (259% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bethesda Gardens, Terre Haute TCR series: 2018=12.6 · 2019=7.7 · 2020=9.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Bethesda Gardens, Terre Haute falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #106 safest of 133 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Indiana.

Bethesda Gardens, Terre Haute (30 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Bethesda Gardens, Terre Haute
Bethesda Gardens, Terre Haute (30 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Bethesda Gardens, Terre Haute has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 9.2 4.6 2 0 0
2019 7.7 3.9 2 0 0
2018 12.6 9.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · IN · Terre Haute

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 194 employers in Terre Haute, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brenden Gardens 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hickory Village 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harmony Place 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wardwell 9.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Noblesville Generating Station 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lawrenceburg Power, LLC 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE HQ 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steuben County REMC 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Terre Haute Regional Hospital 698 FTE
CITY-NEAR Union Hospital Terre Haute 697 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vigo County Government 662 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Terre Haute 661 FTE
NAT-TCR Hospice at Home 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Rock Sports 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Meyer Services 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Dakota Mobile Hydraulics 9.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mountain View Family Practice 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cleveland Building Restoration 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amalgamated Financial Equities III 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Seneca Medical Associates 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.