Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Texas

Bethesda Gardens

Frisco, TX · ~44 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bethesda Gardens runs at 291% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Bethesda Gardens: 11.1 TCR = 291% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bethesda Gardens safety composite

Bethesda Gardens scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−34.1

2018→2024

Bethesda Gardens injury rate improved

Bethesda Gardens's TCR fell 34.1 from 34.1 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 34.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=34.1 · 2019=14.5 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=14.2 · 2023=8.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Frisco, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.1 · 291% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #371/470
  • PHOTO Commonwealth Senior …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Commonwealth Senior Living at Farnham (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Bethesda Gardens in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bethesda Gardens averages 11.1 TCR (291% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bethesda Gardens TCR series: 2018=34.1 · 2019=14.5 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=14.2 · 2023=8.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Bethesda Gardens falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #371 safest of 470 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Texas.

Bethesda Gardens (44 employees, TCR 11.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Bethesda Gardens
Bethesda Gardens (44 employees, TCR 11.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Bethesda Gardens has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 8.4 2.8 3 0 0
2022 14.2 8.5 5 0 0
2021 3.3 0.0 1 0 0
2020 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2019 14.5 5.8 4 1 0
2018 34.1 22.7 11 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · TX · Frisco

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 174 employers in Frisco, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Commonwealth Senior Living at Farnham 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Trail Ridge 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Villas of Holly Brook - Danville 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vista Prado, Inc. 11.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corteva - Lubbock Research 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE WRANGLER FEED YARD 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Devon Energy Corporation - Cresson 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Driver Directional, Inc. 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4701-238 8,351 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4701-RRD 2,767 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4016-18236000 1,108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sinacola 845 FTE
NAT-TCR Access Senior Home Care, Inc. 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Lane's End Farm 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Balkema Excavating, Inc 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Fort Morgan Facility 11.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Richwood Industries 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tremont, PA - 50 Rausch Creek Rd 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE TN - Comcast 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3498 - BELFOR Franchise Group MI 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.