Home health agencies · Missouri

Bethesda Health Group- St. Andrews and Bethesda Home Health

St. Louis, MO · ~19 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.9
Avg TCR
5.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bethesda Health Group- St. Andrews and Bethesda Home Health runs at 286% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Home health agencies workplace, earning a grade F.

Bethesda Health Group- St. Andrews and Bethesda Home Health: 14.9 TCR = 286% of Home health agencies BLS 5.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bethesda Health Group- St. Andrews and Bethesda Home Health safety composite

Bethesda Health Group- St. Andrews and Bethesda Home Health scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 29.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bethesda Health Group- St. Andrews and Bethesda Home Health: 0.0 → 29.8 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 29.8 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2020

Bethesda Health Group- St. Andrews and Bethesda Home Health's TCR rose 29.8 from 0.0 in 2019 to 29.8 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621610 · St. Louis, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.9 · 286% of ind

  • DART 29.8 DART
  • RANK #74/75
  • PHOTO Comfort Health
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~19 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Comfort Health (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Bethesda Health Group- St. Andrews and Bethesda Home Health in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bethesda Health Group- St. Andrews and Bethesda Home Health averages 14.9 TCR (286% of the Home health agencies BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bethesda Health Group- St. Andrews and Bethesda Home Health TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=29.8 · BLS 5.2

Where Bethesda Health Group- St. Andrews and Bethesda Home Health falls in its industry

3,635 Home health agencies establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #74 safest of 75 Home health agencies employers in Missouri.

Bethesda Health Group- St. Andrews and Bethesda Home Health (19 employees, TCR 14.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Bethesda Health Group- St. Andrews and Bethesda Home Health
Bethesda Health Group- St. Andrews and Bethesda Home Health (19 employees, TCR 14.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Bethesda Health Group- St. Andrews and Bethesda Home Health has fewer employees than the Home health agencies median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 29.8 29.8 2 3 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621610 · MO · St. Louis

3,635 Home health agencies employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 686 employers in St. Louis, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Comfort Health 14.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trilogy Home Healthcare 14.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blue Springs Hospice 14.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Interim HealthCare of Greater Denver 14.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Black Gold Farms MOC 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE Select Genetics MO Rocky Point 006-0138-RP 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stokes-Mayberry Gin Co., Inc. 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE King City Seed, Inc 19 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monsanto - St. Louis 6,028 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Anthony's Medical Center 3,706 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABI Corporation 2,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Louis University Hospital 2,084 FTE
NAT-TCR Truck Accessories Group - East (Aluminum Plant) 14.9 TCR
NAT-TCR WorldMark Olympic Village, Olympic Valley CA 14.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Twining Village 14.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Meat Processing Plant 14.9 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.