Construction management, commercial and institutional building · Connecticut

BHD/JV Charter Oak Bridge

Torrington, CT · ~104 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

BHD/JV Charter Oak Bridge runs at 182% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Construction management, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade D.

BHD/JV Charter Oak Bridge: 5.3 TCR = 182% of Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

BHD/JV Charter Oak Bridge safety composite

BHD/JV Charter Oak Bridge scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2019→2023

BHD/JV Charter Oak Bridge injury rate improved

BHD/JV Charter Oak Bridge's TCR fell 1.7 from 1.7 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 12.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=1.7 · 2020=5.0 · 2021=6.9 · 2022=12.9 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Torrington, CT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 182% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #39/55
  • PHOTO Ferguson Constructio…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~104 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ferguson Construction Company - Sidney (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

BHD/JV Charter Oak Bridge in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows BHD/JV Charter Oak Bridge averages 5.3 TCR (182% of the Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

BHD/JV Charter Oak Bridge TCR series: 2019=1.7 · 2020=5 · 2021=6.9 · 2022=12.9 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.9

Where BHD/JV Charter Oak Bridge falls in its industry

4,692 Construction management, comme establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 55 Construction management, comme employers in Connecticut.

BHD/JV Charter Oak Bridge (104 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate BHD/JV Charter Oak Bridge
BHD/JV Charter Oak Bridge (104 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

BHD/JV Charter Oak Bridge has more employees than the Construction management, commercial and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 12.9 7.1 9 0 0
2021 6.9 6.0 8 0 0
2020 5.0 4.3 8 0 0
2019 1.7 1.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · CT · Torrington

4,692 Construction management, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 87 employers in Torrington, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ferguson Construction Company - Sidney 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR PJ Dick Incorporated - UPMC Presbyterian (21089, 21264) 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Paul Reed Construction & Supply, Inc. 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Boson Company 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ralph Camputaro and Son Excavating, Inc. 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE BRANCH - CT - Connecticut Central 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Earthlight Main 104 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jeffco Fibres Inc. 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHARLOTTE HUNGERFORD HOSPITAL 949 FTE
CITY-NEAR Charlotte Hungerford Hospital (540) 924 FTE
CITY-NEAR O&G Entire Company 801 FTE
CITY-NEAR O&G Industries, Inc. 783 FTE
NAT-TCR Phenix City Dirt Cheap 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Anthology of Wheaton 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ashford Hall 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Goodwin House Bailey's Crossroads 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lantier Construction Co. 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Allied Power Services - Exelon, Nine Mile Point 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Isd 2908 Brandon-Evansville 104 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quivira Inc 104 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.