Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise · North Carolina

BIC Charlotte Distribution

Charlotte, NC · ~109 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

BIC Charlotte Distribution runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise workplace, earning a grade A.

BIC Charlotte Distribution: 2.2 TCR = 38% of Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

BIC Charlotte Distribution safety composite

BIC Charlotte Distribution scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2016→2024

BIC Charlotte Distribution injury rate improved

BIC Charlotte Distribution's TCR fell 2.4 from 3.3 in 2016 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.3 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Charlotte, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.2 · 38% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #113/330
  • PHOTO DSC1 Logistics
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~109 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DSC1 Logistics (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

BIC Charlotte Distribution in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows BIC Charlotte Distribution averages 2.2 TCR (38% of the Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

BIC Charlotte Distribution TCR series: 2016=3.3 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 5.8

Where BIC Charlotte Distribution falls in its industry

9,477 Private warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #113 safest of 330 Private warehousing and storag employers in North Carolina.

BIC Charlotte Distribution (109 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate BIC Charlotte Distribution
BIC Charlotte Distribution (109 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

BIC Charlotte Distribution has more employees than the Private warehousing and storage, general median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2023 3.7 1.9 4 0 0
2022 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2021 3.5 3.5 4 0 0
2020 2.8 1.9 3 0 1
2019 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2018 1.9 1.9 2 0 0
2016 3.3 2.2 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · NC · Charlotte

9,477 Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DSC1 Logistics 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR LaGrou 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 61009 CAPSTONE US PERTH AMBOY 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR National Distribution Centers LLC-15710 San Antonio Ave. 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Primoris T&D Services - Charlotte 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Graham 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mid Atlantic Infrastructure Systems Inc 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gaines and company Inc 109 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Owens Corning Brentwood 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Concord 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Mje, LLC 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 203 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hawaii Branch 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Groesbeck Masonry, Inc. 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0646 Reston 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE Charlotte 109 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.