Packaging services (except packing and crating for transportation) · North Carolina

BIC Charlotte Packaging

Charlotte, NC · ~546 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

BIC Charlotte Packaging runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Packaging services (except packing and crating for transportation) workplace, earning a grade B.

BIC Charlotte Packaging: 2.0 TCR = 77% of Packaging services (except packing and crating for transportation) BLS 2.6 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

BIC Charlotte Packaging safety composite

BIC Charlotte Packaging scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2016→2024

BIC Charlotte Packaging injury rate improved

BIC Charlotte Packaging's TCR fell 0.9 from 1.9 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.9 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=2.0 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561910 · Charlotte, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 77% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #9/14
  • PHOTO Menasha Packaging Co…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 86 inj
  • SIZE ~546 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Menasha Packaging Company-Fontana (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

BIC Charlotte Packaging in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows BIC Charlotte Packaging averages 2.0 TCR (77% of the Packaging services (except packing and crating for transportation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

BIC Charlotte Packaging TCR series: 2016=1.9 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=2 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 2.6

Where BIC Charlotte Packaging falls in its industry

228 Packaging services (except pac establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 14 Packaging services (except pac employers in North Carolina.

BIC Charlotte Packaging (546 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate BIC Charlotte Packaging
BIC Charlotte Packaging (546 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

BIC Charlotte Packaging has more employees than the Packaging services (except packing and c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 1.1 4 0 0
2023 2.0 0.7 8 0 0
2022 1.6 1.4 9 0 0
2021 1.7 0.6 8 1 0
2020 1.7 0.8 10 0 0
2019 2.7 2.3 17 0 0
2018 3.4 2.2 19 1 0
2016 1.9 1.8 11 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561910 · NC · Charlotte

228 Packaging services (except packing and crating for transportation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Menasha Packaging Company-Fontana 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bolke Miller Company (1) 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR BD Holdrege Medical Device 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kem Krest - Bristol 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE County of Stanly 546 FTE
STATE-SIZE Human Service Center Swinburne 546 FTE
STATE-SIZE D. H. Griffin Wrecking Company, Inc. 547 FTE
STATE-SIZE bioMerieux Commercial Operations 547 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR National Distribution Centers LLC-27143 Elwood International Port Rd 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Staybridge Suites 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR MBC Dallas 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR FS12370 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE POTTER STRUCTURES, Ltd. 546 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brownstown Complex 546 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anheuser-Busch Jacksonville Brewery 546 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aec Slc W 546 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.