Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Indiana

Bickford of Crawfordsville

Crawfordsville, IN · ~24 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bickford of Crawfordsville runs at 441% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Bickford of Crawfordsville: 16.8 TCR = 441% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bickford of Crawfordsville safety composite

Bickford of Crawfordsville scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 22.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bickford of Crawfordsville: 9.8 → 22.1 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 46.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.32× in 2021

Bickford of Crawfordsville's TCR rose 12.4 from 9.8 in 2016 to 22.1 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 46.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Crawfordsville, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.8 · 441% of ind

  • DART 22.1 DART
  • RANK #129/136
  • PHOTO Rosetta, LLC
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rosetta, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Bickford of Crawfordsville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bickford of Crawfordsville averages 16.8 TCR (441% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bickford of Crawfordsville TCR series: 2016=9.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=46.1 · 2021=22.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Bickford of Crawfordsville falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #129 safest of 136 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Indiana.

Bickford of Crawfordsville (24 employees, TCR 16.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Bickford of Crawfordsville
Bickford of Crawfordsville (24 employees, TCR 16.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Bickford of Crawfordsville has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 22.1 22.1 0 3 0
2020 46.1 46.1 0 5 0
2019 5.8 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 9.8 9.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · IN · Crawfordsville

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 66 employers in Crawfordsville, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rosetta, LLC 16.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Regency Village at Bend 16.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Champaign Bickford 16.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kingswood Senior Living 16.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Midwest Poultry Services - Corporate Office 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midwest Pullet Farm / QC / Lab 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE 327-NiSource-West Terre Haute IN 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bedford Operations Center 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR LSC Communications 986 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeside Book Company - Crawfordsville 833 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nucor Steel 793 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nucor Steel-Indiana 765 FTE
NAT-TCR Legacy Air, Inc. San Leandro 16.8 TCR
NAT-TCR DFS Nebraska Plant 16.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Gulfbreeze Courtyard 16.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Aperion Care Fairfield 16.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE ATLPF - Homewood Suites Perimeter 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lima Hospice 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clarendon Hill Towers 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Viking SupplyNet - Carol Stream 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.