Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Kansas

Bickford of Mission Springs

Mission, KS · ~67 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bickford of Mission Springs runs at 475% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Bickford of Mission Springs: 18.0 TCR = 475% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bickford of Mission Springs safety composite

Bickford of Mission Springs scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bickford of Mission Springs: 4.1 → 16.7 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 43.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.72× in 2021

Bickford of Mission Springs's TCR rose 12.6 from 4.1 in 2016 to 16.7 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 43.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Mission, KS ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.0 · 475% of ind

  • DART 13.0 DART
  • RANK #63/69
  • PHOTO Bickford of Urbandale
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bickford of Urbandale (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Bickford of Mission Springs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bickford of Mission Springs averages 18.0 TCR (475% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bickford of Mission Springs TCR series: 2016=4.1 · 2018=11.2 · 2019=15 · 2020=43.2 · 2021=16.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Bickford of Mission Springs falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #63 safest of 69 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Kansas.

Bickford of Mission Springs (67 employees, TCR 18.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Bickford of Mission Springs
Bickford of Mission Springs (67 employees, TCR 18.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Bickford of Mission Springs has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 16.7 13.0 7 2 0
2020 43.2 38.1 6 11 0
2019 15.0 12.5 6 0 0
2018 11.2 9.0 4 1 0
2016 4.1 4.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · KS · Mission

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 29 employers in Mission, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bickford of Urbandale 18.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Porter Place 18.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sioux City II Bickford 18.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edgewood Mandan LLC 18.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hoxie Feedyard 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midwest Feeders, Inc. 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Icon Structures Inc. 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Haren Holdings LLC 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR ScriptPro LLC 640 FTE
CITY-NEAR SciptPro USA 420 FTE
CITY-NEAR INDUSTRIAL ACCESSORIES COMPANY 419 FTE
CITY-NEAR VinSolutions Kansas-Mission 309 FTE
NAT-TCR Bickford of Urbandale 18.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Torrington Police Department 18.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Haliburton International Foods 18.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Summit Reconstruction and Restoration 18.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Balchem Corp 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cabo Construction Corp 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Good Samaritan Society - Idaho Falls Village 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mutual Distributing Company - Greensboro 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.