Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Michigan

Bickford of Saginaw Township

Saginaw, MI · ~45 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bickford of Saginaw Township runs at 447% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Bickford of Saginaw Township: 17.0 TCR = 447% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bickford of Saginaw Township safety composite

Bickford of Saginaw Township scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 31.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bickford of Saginaw Township: 8.0 → 31.9 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 59.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.88× in 2021

Bickford of Saginaw Township's TCR rose 23.8 from 8.0 in 2016 to 31.9 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 59.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.88× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Saginaw, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.0 · 447% of ind

  • DART 31.9 DART
  • RANK #86/97
  • PHOTO Heritage Woods and W…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Heritage Woods and White Oaks of Huntley (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Bickford of Saginaw Township in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bickford of Saginaw Township averages 17.0 TCR (447% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bickford of Saginaw Township TCR series: 2016=8 · 2018=11 · 2019=17 · 2020=59.1 · 2021=31.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Bickford of Saginaw Township falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #86 safest of 97 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Michigan.

Bickford of Saginaw Township (45 employees, TCR 17.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Bickford of Saginaw Township
Bickford of Saginaw Township (45 employees, TCR 17.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Bickford of Saginaw Township has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 31.9 31.9 2 8 0
2020 59.1 59.1 1 10 0
2019 17.0 12.8 4 0 0
2018 11.0 7.3 3 0 0
2016 8.0 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MI · Saginaw

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 278 employers in Saginaw, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Heritage Woods and White Oaks of Huntley 17.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edgewood May Creek 17.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Westchester Village of Lenexa 17.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Simpson Meadows 16.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Grand Junction Office 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE DeWeerdt Poultry Farm, LLC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clare SC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thomas Sebold and Associates, Inc. 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nexteer Automotive Saginaw Site 4,015 FTE
CITY-NEAR 700 Cooper 2,129 FTE
CITY-NEAR Morley - Saginaw 2,039 FTE
CITY-NEAR Caravan Facilities Management 1,677 FTE
NAT-TCR Spee-Dee Delivery Service, Inc. - Bloomington 17.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Drury Inn & Suites - San Antonio Riverwalk 17.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Freight Lines Inc - Durham 17.0 TCR
NAT-TCR S & S Grove Management Services, Inc. 17.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bickford of Omaha 1 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tasca Automotive Group Rt 6 One Inc 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plaza Tire & Auto Service 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hilary's Eat Well 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.