Pressure treated lumber made from purchased lumber · Michigan

Biewer of Lansing

Lansing, MI · ~52 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Biewer of Lansing runs at 278% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Pressure treated lumber made from purchased lumber workplace, earning a grade F.

Biewer of Lansing: 9.2 TCR = 278% of Pressure treated lumber made from purchased lumber BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Biewer of Lansing safety composite

Biewer of Lansing scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.0

2016→2023

Biewer of Lansing injury rate improved

Biewer of Lansing's TCR fell 7.0 from 13.7 in 2016 to 6.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 13.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.73× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=13.7 · 2017=8.1 · 2018=8.4 · 2019=13.9 · 2021=8.1 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=6.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321114 · Lansing, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.2 · 278% of ind

  • DART 6.7 DART
  • RANK #5/5
  • PHOTO Bestway of Pennsylva…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bestway of Pennsylvanis, Inc. (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Biewer of Lansing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Biewer of Lansing averages 9.2 TCR (278% of the Pressure treated lumber made from purchased lumber BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Biewer of Lansing TCR series: 2016=13.7 · 2017=8.1 · 2018=8.4 · 2019=13.9 · 2021=8.1 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=6.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Biewer of Lansing falls in its industry

183 Pressure treated lumber made f establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 5 Pressure treated lumber made f employers in Michigan.

Biewer of Lansing (52 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Biewer of Lansing
Biewer of Lansing (52 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Biewer of Lansing has more employees than the Pressure treated lumber made from purcha median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 6.7 6.7 5 0 0
2022 5.2 5.2 3 0 0
2021 8.1 8.1 4 0 0
2019 13.9 8.0 7 0 0
2018 8.4 5.0 5 0 0
2017 8.1 6.5 5 0 0
2016 13.7 3.4 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321114 · MI · Lansing

183 Pressure treated lumber made from purchased lumber employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 410 employers in Lansing, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bestway of Pennsylvanis, Inc. 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Long Life Treated Wood, Inc. 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Consolidated Forest Products Hackleburg 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4305/3339 - Holiday City DC Treat 9.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE C3 Industries, Inc - Webberville 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenwood Energy Center 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hastings SC 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dollins Construction Inc dba Cowhy Hayes 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lansing Delta Township Assembly 2,608 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Motors Lansing Delta Township Assembly 2,446 FTE
CITY-NEAR LCC - Main 2,258 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lansing Grand River Assembly 1,648 FTE
NAT-TCR Trichromatic-West Inc. 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Penn Union Corp 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Diana's Mexican Food Products, INC 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Tribute at One Loudoun 9.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ripley Metalworks 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rogers Motor, LLC. 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dsi Bulk Transport Co Inc 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Priority Acura 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.