Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors · California

Bill Howe Heating and Air Conditioning

San Diego, CA · ~33 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bill Howe Heating and Air Conditioning runs at 138% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Bill Howe Heating and Air Conditioning: 3.9 TCR = 138% of Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bill Howe Heating and Air Conditioning safety composite

Bill Howe Heating and Air Conditioning scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bill Howe Heating and Air Conditioning: 3.3 → 11.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 11.0 TCR · DART/TCR 2.85× in 2024

Bill Howe Heating and Air Conditioning's TCR rose 7.7 from 3.3 in 2017 to 11.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · San Diego, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.9 · 138% of ind

  • DART 11.0 DART
  • RANK #295/594
  • PHOTO Comfort Systems USA …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Comfort Systems USA Ohio Columbus (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Bill Howe Heating and Air Conditioning in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bill Howe Heating and Air Conditioning averages 3.9 TCR (138% of the Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bill Howe Heating and Air Conditioning TCR series: 2017=3.3 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=2.9 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=11 · BLS 2.8

Where Bill Howe Heating and Air Conditioning falls in its industry

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-c establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #295 safest of 594 Heating, ventilation and air-c employers in California.

Bill Howe Heating and Air Conditioning (33 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Bill Howe Heating and Air Conditioning
Bill Howe Heating and Air Conditioning (33 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Bill Howe Heating and Air Conditioning has fewer employees than the Heating, ventilation and air-conditionin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.0 11.0 4 0 0
2023 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2022 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2021 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2020 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2019 2.7 0.0 1 0 0
2018 2.7 0.0 1 0 0
2017 3.3 3.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · CA · San Diego

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,979 employers in San Diego, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Comfort Systems USA Ohio Columbus 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3285_7041 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4915_11398 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Total Energy Management, Inc. 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tutti Frutti Farms 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE EL CENTRO 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE BULLSEYE FARMS 18 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE River Vista Farms LLC 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Diego Health 9,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Atomics 8,108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health Human Services Agency 6,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR National University 4,955 FTE
NAT-TCR Delaware OH Truss 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Colorado jetCenter, Inc. 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Kansas City South 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR S03891 - Fort Walton Beach Hauling 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pelham AL Yard 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bend OR Yard 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arlington WA Yard 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mercedes TX Truss 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.