Locating underground utility lines prior to digging · Montana

Billings, MT

Billings, MT · ~113 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Billings, MT runs at 103% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Locating underground utility lines prior to digging workplace, earning a grade C.

Billings, MT: 2.7 TCR = 103% of Locating underground utility lines prior to digging BLS 2.6 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Billings, MT safety composite

Billings, MT scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Billings, MT held a steady TCR band

Billings, MT's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=4.0 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561990 · Billings, MT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 103% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO Southpointe Energy R…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~113 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Southpointe Energy Resources, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Montana employers → · Look up another →

Billings, MT in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Billings, MT averages 2.7 TCR (103% of the Locating underground utility lines prior to digging BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Billings, MT TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=4 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.6

Where Billings, MT falls in its industry

208 Locating underground utility l establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Montana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Locating underground utility l employers in Montana.

Billings, MT (113 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Billings, MT
Billings, MT (113 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Billings, MT has more employees than the Locating underground utility lines prior median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.2 5.2 1 0 0
2021 4.0 4.0 1 0 0
2020 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2019 4.5 1.5 2 1 0
2018 4.2 4.2 6 0 0
2017 3.1 3.1 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561990 · MT · Billings

208 Locating underground utility lines prior to digging employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,536 rated employers in Montana with headcount on file · 327 employers in Billings, MT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Southpointe Energy Resources, LLC 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Web Industries Atlanta 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 230 Kingsport 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Specialty Underwater Services 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE JTL Group Inc. DBA Knife River-Belgrade 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE ABS-0030-0030-00043 FAC-00043-MISSOULA-MT 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE SWY-0030-0031-02999 FAC-02999-BOZEMAN-MT 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE PASTA MONTANA 114 FTE
CITY-NEAR Billings Clinic Hospital 2,366 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Vincent Healthcare 1,860 FTE
CITY-NEAR Billings Clinic Downtown Campus 1,223 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. John's Lutheran Ministries 651 FTE
NAT-TCR 075/Providence 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Al Pak Labor, Inc. 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Underground Storage 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Maples Industries Plant Two Location 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE 340 South Liberty St. 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hartmann Electric Company, Inc. 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE HGI Knoxville 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Municipio Autonomo De Caguas Policia Municipal De Caguas - Comandancia - 14207 00 113 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.