Plastics working machinery manufacturing · Virginia

Bingham and Taylor - Blow Molding

Fredericksburg, VA · ~39 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bingham and Taylor - Blow Molding runs at 92% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Plastics working machinery manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Bingham and Taylor - Blow Molding: 3.0 TCR = 92% of Plastics working machinery manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bingham and Taylor - Blow Molding safety composite

Bingham and Taylor - Blow Molding scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2020→2024

Bingham and Taylor - Blow Molding injury rate improved

Bingham and Taylor - Blow Molding's TCR fell 2.2 from 2.2 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=2.2 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=5.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333249 · Fredericksburg, VA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 92% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/8
  • PHOTO Precision Process
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Precision Process (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Bingham and Taylor - Blow Molding in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bingham and Taylor - Blow Molding averages 3.0 TCR (92% of the Plastics working machinery manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bingham and Taylor - Blow Molding TCR series: 2020=2.2 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=5.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Bingham and Taylor - Blow Molding falls in its industry

448 Plastics working machinery man establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 8 Plastics working machinery man employers in Virginia.

Bingham and Taylor - Blow Molding (39 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Bingham and Taylor - Blow Molding
Bingham and Taylor - Blow Molding (39 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Bingham and Taylor - Blow Molding has fewer employees than the Plastics working machinery manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 5.3 5.3 2 0 0
2022 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2021 5.5 5.5 3 0 0
2020 2.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333249 · VA · Fredericksburg

448 Plastics working machinery manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 279 employers in Fredericksburg, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Precision Process 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR BACA Systems 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sheridan 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR AATI P3 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Select Genetics VA Hatch 60 61 62 64 65 66, 950-VA 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Utilities - Sewerage Systems 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.D. Kerns Construction Company, Inc. 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE DWATTS Construction LLC 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR SPOTSYLVANIA COUNTY SCHOOLS 2,863 FTE
CITY-NEAR MARY WASHINGTON HOSPITAL 1,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR GERMANNA COMMUNITY COLLEGE 865 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brookdale Fredericksburg 848 FTE
NAT-TCR KJ's Market #611 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 3001 - Phoenix, AZ 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1091 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR DIVCON, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Euclid Medical Office 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vermont-Western District Maintenance 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rancho Cienega District Maint. 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sutton-Garten Company 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.