Electric Power Distribution · Alabama

Birmingham Division Patton Chapel Crew Headquarters

Hoover, AL · ~46 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Birmingham Division Patton Chapel Crew Headquarters runs at 435% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric Power Distribution workplace, earning a grade F.

Birmingham Division Patton Chapel Crew Headquarters: 5.2 TCR = 435% of Electric Power Distribution BLS 1.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Birmingham Division Patton Chapel Crew Headquarters safety composite

Birmingham Division Patton Chapel Crew Headquarters scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2016→2017

Birmingham Division Patton Chapel Crew Headquarters injury rate improved

Birmingham Division Patton Chapel Crew Headquarters's TCR fell 2.1 from 6.3 in 2016 to 4.2 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.3 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.3 · 2017=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Hoover, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.2 · 435% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #89/138
  • PHOTO Eversource - East Ha…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Eversource - East Hampton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Birmingham Division Patton Chapel Crew Headquarters in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Birmingham Division Patton Chapel Crew Headquarters averages 5.2 TCR (435% of the Electric Power Distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Birmingham Division Patton Chapel Crew Headquarters TCR series: 2016=6.3 · 2017=4.2 · BLS 1.2

Where Birmingham Division Patton Chapel Crew Headquarters falls in its industry

2,958 Electric Power Distribution establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #89 safest of 138 Electric Power Distribution employers in Alabama.

Birmingham Division Patton Chapel Crew Headquarters (46 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Birmingham Division Patton Chapel Crew Headquarters
Birmingham Division Patton Chapel Crew Headquarters (46 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Birmingham Division Patton Chapel Crew Headquarters has fewer employees than the Electric Power Distribution median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 4.2 4.2 2 0 0
2016 6.3 6.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · AL · Hoover

2,958 Electric Power Distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 82 employers in Hoover, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Eversource - East Hampton 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR ATHENS UTILITIES BOARD 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Britt Operating 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dodson Service Center 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fairknoll Hatchery 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elkmont Vet Lab 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alabama Stone Co 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hillcrest 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR BRHMALDC 858 FTE
CITY-NEAR BRHMALDC - AT&T Mobility Services LLC 712 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1229 357 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2111 344 FTE
NAT-TCR Salisbury (Mdsal) 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Evansville (Ineva) 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Fallsburg Day Program 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Lakes and Plains Construction Inc. 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Paul Jackson and Son, Inc. 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE TR Construction 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Waters of Minocqua 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holiday Inn Express and Suites Madison - Verona 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.