Dimension lumber, softwood, resawing purchased lumber · Oregon

Blasen & Blasen Lumber Corp.

Portland, OR · ~34 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Blasen & Blasen Lumber Corp. runs at 203% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Dimension lumber, softwood, resawing purchased lumber workplace, earning a grade F.

Blasen & Blasen Lumber Corp.: 6.7 TCR = 203% of Dimension lumber, softwood, resawing purchased lumber BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Blasen & Blasen Lumber Corp. safety composite

Blasen & Blasen Lumber Corp. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2016→2024

Blasen & Blasen Lumber Corp. injury rate improved

Blasen & Blasen Lumber Corp.'s TCR fell 3.3 from 6.5 in 2016 to 3.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 19.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.5 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=11.8 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=19.8 · 2022=3.2 · 2023=9.6 · 2024=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321912 · Portland, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.7 · 203% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/24
  • PHOTO Shuqualak Lumber Com…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Shuqualak Lumber Company, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Blasen & Blasen Lumber Corp. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Blasen & Blasen Lumber Corp. averages 6.7 TCR (203% of the Dimension lumber, softwood, resawing purchased lumber BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Blasen & Blasen Lumber Corp. TCR series: 2016=6.5 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=11.8 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=19.8 · 2022=3.2 · 2023=9.6 · 2024=3.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Blasen & Blasen Lumber Corp. falls in its industry

178 Dimension lumber, softwood, re establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 24 Dimension lumber, softwood, re employers in Oregon.

Blasen & Blasen Lumber Corp. (34 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Blasen & Blasen Lumber Corp.
Blasen & Blasen Lumber Corp. (34 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Blasen & Blasen Lumber Corp. has fewer employees than the Dimension lumber, softwood, resawing pur median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.2 0.0 1 0 0
2023 9.6 9.6 3 0 0
2022 3.2 0.0 0 1 0
2021 19.8 16.5 6 0 0
2020 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2019 11.8 5.9 4 0 0
2018 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 6.5 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321912 · OR · Portland

178 Dimension lumber, softwood, resawing purchased lumber employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 1,728 employers in Portland, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Shuqualak Lumber Company, Inc 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sagebrush Sales 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4008 - Eau Claire Board 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR COS - Bartlett 6.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gabriel Farms Inc 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cooper Family Orchards LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sage Hollow Ranch 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elkton 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHSU Main Campus 18,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR349 PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR-PORTLA 4,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR346 PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CTR-PORTLAND 3,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000530 3,498 FTE
NAT-TCR Tiff's Treats - A5 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR UPMC Senior Communities 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Kamco Industries, Inc. Morenci Plant 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR POM 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Scoular Hancock 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Superior Kilns 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Genesee Construction Service, Inc. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nutri-Feeds, LLC 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.