Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction · Minnesota

Blattner Energy Inc

Avon, MN · ~2,881 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Blattner Energy Inc runs at 25% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Blattner Energy Inc: 0.7 TCR = 25% of Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Blattner Energy Inc safety composite

Blattner Energy Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Blattner Energy Inc held a steady TCR band

Blattner Energy Inc's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.5 in 2017 to 0.8 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 0.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.94× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.5 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Avon, MN AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 25% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #5/38
  • PHOTO Arrow Drillers dba A…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 137 inj
  • SIZE ~2,881 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Arrow Drillers dba Arrow Construction (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Blattner Energy Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Blattner Energy Inc averages 0.7 TCR (25% of the Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Blattner Energy Inc TCR series: 2017=0.5 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=0.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Blattner Energy Inc falls in its industry

1,605 Alternative energy (e.g., geot establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 38 Alternative energy (e.g., geot employers in Minnesota.

Blattner Energy Inc (2,881 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Blattner Energy Inc
Blattner Energy Inc (2,881 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Blattner Energy Inc has more employees than the Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, oc median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.8 0.7 36 0 0
2020 0.8 0.5 36 0 0
2019 0.8 0.6 28 0 0
2018 0.7 0.3 23 0 1
2017 0.5 0.2 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · MN · Avon

1,605 Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 12 employers in Avon, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Arrow Drillers dba Arrow Construction 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bowlin Communications, LLC 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jacobs Telecommunications 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ABLe Communications, Inc. HQ 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE 0081 BLOOMINGTON 8170 BLDG 2,884 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMRG 2,891 FTE
STATE-SIZE FV Southdale Hospital 2,891 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mercy Hospital 2,851 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blattner Company LLC 6,665 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbia Gear 277 FTE
CITY-NEAR 118_12578 163 FTE
CITY-NEAR Midsota Manufacturing 129 FTE
NAT-TCR Westminster, Colorado, Office 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Trinity Health PACE 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR RS 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Mustang Power Plant 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dominguez Farms 2,881 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shea Medical Ctr Campus 2,881 FTE
NAT-SIZE Medtronic MiniMed 2,884 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cabell Huntington Hospital Inc 2,876 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.