Manufactured (mobile) buildings for commercial use (e.g., banks, offices) manufacturing · Oregon

Blazer Industries

Aumsville, OR · ~155 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Blazer Industries runs at 381% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Manufactured (mobile) buildings for commercial use (e.g., banks, offices) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Blazer Industries: 12.6 TCR = 381% of Manufactured (mobile) buildings for commercial use (e.g., banks, offices) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Blazer Industries safety composite

Blazer Industries scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.1

2016→2024

Blazer Industries injury rate improved

Blazer Industries's TCR fell 11.1 from 18.4 in 2016 to 7.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 23.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=18.4 · 2017=9.3 · 2018=10.2 · 2019=14.4 · 2020=9.6 · 2021=13.4 · 2022=23.1 · 2023=7.4 · 2024=7.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321991 · Aumsville, OR ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 12.6 · 381% of ind

  • DART 7.3 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Skyline Champion #233
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 146 inj
  • SIZE ~155 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Skyline Champion #233 (0.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Blazer Industries in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Blazer Industries averages 12.6 TCR (381% of the Manufactured (mobile) buildings for commercial use (e.g., banks, offices) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Blazer Industries TCR series: 2016=18.4 · 2017=9.3 · 2018=10.2 · 2019=14.4 · 2020=9.6 · 2021=13.4 · 2022=23.1 · 2023=7.4 · 2024=7.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Blazer Industries falls in its industry

175 Manufactured (mobile) building establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Manufactured (mobile) building employers in Oregon.

Blazer Industries (155 employees, TCR 12.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 175 employees and a TCR of 6.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Blazer Industries
Blazer Industries (155 employees, TCR 12.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 175 employees and a TCR of 6.8

Blazer Industries has fewer employees than the Manufactured (mobile) buildings for comm median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.3 7.3 11 0 0
2023 7.4 6.1 11 0 0
2022 23.1 21.5 9 20 0
2021 13.4 12.8 20 1 0
2020 9.6 8.0 12 0 0
2019 14.4 10.0 23 0 0
2018 10.2 7.9 17 1 0
2017 9.3 3.7 15 0 0
2016 18.4 8.9 28 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321991 · OR · Aumsville

175 Manufactured (mobile) buildings for commercial use (e.g., banks, offices) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 5 employers in Aumsville, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Skyline Champion #233 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Champion Home Builders/Titan Homes 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Champion Modular, Inc 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sunshine Homes Inc 11.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE RDF Builders Co 155 FTE
STATE-SIZE TCM 155 FTE
STATE-SIZE Darigold - Portland 155 FTE
STATE-SIZE santiam 155 FTE
CITY-NEAR Modern Building Systems 139 FTE
CITY-NEAR VPF, Inc 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Doerfler Farms, Inc. 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cascade 31 FTE
NAT-TCR Wilbert Burial Vault of Ft. Branch 12.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Downingtown Plant 12.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Aaron Metals Company Inc. 12.6 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Calumet City - Fire 12.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pointe Precision, Inc. 155 FTE
NAT-SIZE Commercial Solutions Division - West 155 FTE
NAT-SIZE XSW 155 FTE
NAT-SIZE West DOC 155 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.