Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding · Illinois

Blessing Surgery Center

Quincy, IL · ~59 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Blessing Surgery Center runs at 151% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding workplace, earning a grade D.

Blessing Surgery Center: 5.7 TCR = 151% of Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Blessing Surgery Center safety composite

Blessing Surgery Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Blessing Surgery Center: 5.4 → 6.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 11.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2021

Blessing Surgery Center's TCR rose 1.1 from 5.4 in 2017 to 6.5 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 11.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621493 · Quincy, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 151% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/21
  • PHOTO Great Lakes Bay Surg…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Great Lakes Bay Surgery & Endoscopy Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Blessing Surgery Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Blessing Surgery Center averages 5.7 TCR (151% of the Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Blessing Surgery Center TCR series: 2017=5.4 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=11.2 · 2021=6.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Blessing Surgery Center falls in its industry

498 Ambulatory surgical centers an establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 21 Ambulatory surgical centers an employers in Illinois.

Blessing Surgery Center (59 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 6.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Blessing Surgery Center
Blessing Surgery Center (59 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 6.2

Blessing Surgery Center has more employees than the Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 6.5 0.0 2 0 0
2020 11.2 0.0 4 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 5.5 5.5 2 0 0
2017 5.4 2.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621493 · IL · Quincy

498 Ambulatory surgical centers and clinics, freestanding employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 155 employers in Quincy, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Great Lakes Bay Surgery & Endoscopy Center 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meadowview ASC, LLC 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR East Michigan Surgery Center 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carnegie Hill Endoscopy 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cornbelt Fire Protection District 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Exelon Nuclear Services & Training Center (STC) 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Electric Field Meter Services 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0G5 - Gas Tech - Engineering 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blessing Corporate Services Inc 2,993 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Knapheide Manufacturing Company 1,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blessing Business Center 514 FTE
CITY-NEAR John Wood Community College 380 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Stamford Hospital - Union 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Strack and Van Til Portage 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Brownfield 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR The Gardens of Roseboro 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Walnut Creek #406 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Mill 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Simi Valley Hospital-Hskp 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4818-TN01 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.