Diagnostic equipment, medical, merchant wholesalers · Michigan

Block Imaging Parts and Service

Holt, MI · ~118 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Block Imaging Parts and Service runs at 8% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Diagnostic equipment, medical, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade A.

Block Imaging Parts and Service: 0.2 TCR = 8% of Diagnostic equipment, medical, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Block Imaging Parts and Service safety composite

Block Imaging Parts and Service scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Block Imaging Parts and Service: 0.0 → 0.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 0.9 TCR · DART/TCR 5.06× in 2024

Block Imaging Parts and Service's TCR rose 0.9 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 5.06× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423450 · Holt, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 8% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #1/33
  • PHOTO Liva Nova, Inc.
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~118 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Liva Nova, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Block Imaging Parts and Service in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Block Imaging Parts and Service averages 0.2 TCR (8% of the Diagnostic equipment, medical, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Block Imaging Parts and Service TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 2.2

Where Block Imaging Parts and Service falls in its industry

754 Diagnostic equipment, medical, establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 33 Diagnostic equipment, medical, employers in Michigan.

Block Imaging Parts and Service (118 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Block Imaging Parts and Service
Block Imaging Parts and Service (118 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Block Imaging Parts and Service has more employees than the Diagnostic equipment, medical, merchant median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.9 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423450 · MI · Holt

754 Diagnostic equipment, medical, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 28 employers in Holt, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Liva Nova, Inc. 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Philips NAM Bakery Square Pittsburgh PA 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3495-11DG100 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Henry Schein Inc. 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cornerstone Ag Enterprises 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Christman Company - Lansing 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE ChristenDETROIT 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Otis Elevator Company-Grand Rapids 118 FTE
CITY-NEAR PRATT & WHITNEY Auto Air Inc. - HOLT 292 FTE
CITY-NEAR RSDC of Michigan 245 FTE
CITY-NEAR Orchid-Orthopedic Solutions LLC 225 FTE
CITY-NEAR RSDC LCC 222 FTE
NAT-TCR Haemonetics - Boston 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR The Dow Chemical Company - Texas City, TX 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 00518 Huntington Plant 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR ExxonMobil Baytown Refinery 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jolly Roofing & Contracting Nashville Office 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fareway Stores, Inc. 561 Waverly 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shop-Vac USA, LLC. 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Willis Construction Co., Inc. 118 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.