Broadcast equipment (including studio), for radio and television, manufacturing · New Jersey

Blonder - Tongue Labs, Inc.

Old Bridge, NJ · ~102 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Blonder - Tongue Labs, Inc. runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Broadcast equipment (including studio), for radio and television, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Blonder - Tongue Labs, Inc.: 2.5 TCR = 77% of Broadcast equipment (including studio), for radio and television, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Blonder - Tongue Labs, Inc. safety composite

Blonder - Tongue Labs, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2016→2022

Blonder - Tongue Labs, Inc. injury rate improved

Blonder - Tongue Labs, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.1 from 2.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.1 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=2.0 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334220 · Old Bridge, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 77% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/7
  • PHOTO Clear-Com Alameda
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~102 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Clear-Com Alameda (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Blonder - Tongue Labs, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Blonder - Tongue Labs, Inc. averages 2.5 TCR (77% of the Broadcast equipment (including studio), for radio and television, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Blonder - Tongue Labs, Inc. TCR series: 2016=2.1 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=2 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Blonder - Tongue Labs, Inc. falls in its industry

247 Broadcast equipment (including establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 7 Broadcast equipment (including employers in New Jersey.

Blonder - Tongue Labs, Inc. (102 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Blonder - Tongue Labs, Inc.
Blonder - Tongue Labs, Inc. (102 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 1.1

Blonder - Tongue Labs, Inc. has fewer employees than the Broadcast equipment (including studio), median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.2 0.0 2 0 0
2020 3.5 0.0 2 1 0
2019 2.0 0.7 3 0 0
2018 3.5 2.6 4 0 0
2017 4.5 3.6 5 0 0
2016 2.1 0.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334220 · NJ · Old Bridge

247 Broadcast equipment (including studio), for radio and television, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 42 employers in Old Bridge, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Clear-Com Alameda 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Radio Design Labs 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR David Clark Companies Incorporated 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wallingford 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE D'Annunzio Group Inc. 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE First Choice Electrical and Security Services LLC 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE BWI - Branchburg 102 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rockline Industries 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raritan Bay Medical Center OBD 663 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raritan Bay Medical Center - OLD BRIDGE DIVISION 587 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4153 344 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4153 335 FTE
NAT-TCR HG571 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Guitar Center Distribution Center 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR United Industries Corp. - Chapin Manufacturing 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Fanatics - Miramar 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gelson's Markets - GDC 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Caravan Kids Catering CKC Good Food 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store #042 102 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pescara 102 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.