Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · New Jersey

Blue Ridge Senior Housing

Mountainside, NJ · ~93 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Blue Ridge Senior Housing runs at 198% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Blue Ridge Senior Housing: 7.5 TCR = 198% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Blue Ridge Senior Housing safety composite

Blue Ridge Senior Housing scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.5

2022→2024

Blue Ridge Senior Housing injury rate improved

Blue Ridge Senior Housing's TCR fell 10.5 from 10.6 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 11.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=10.6 · 2023=11.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Mountainside, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.5 · 198% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #44/92
  • PHOTO ARBOR MANAGEMENT SER…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~93 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ARBOR MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Blue Ridge Senior Housing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Blue Ridge Senior Housing averages 7.5 TCR (198% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Blue Ridge Senior Housing TCR series: 2022=10.6 · 2023=11.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Blue Ridge Senior Housing falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #44 safest of 92 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in New Jersey.

Blue Ridge Senior Housing (93 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Blue Ridge Senior Housing
Blue Ridge Senior Housing (93 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Blue Ridge Senior Housing has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 2 0 0
2023 11.9 10.2 7 0 0
2022 10.6 3.0 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · NJ · Mountainside

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 23 employers in Mountainside, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ARBOR MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edgewood Sierra Hills LLC 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Hearth at Prestwick 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3379 - 1-MAIN 7.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Automatic Rolls of New Jersey 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Harris Freeman Group of Companies NJ 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lallypak Inc 93 FTE
STATE-SIZE Owens Corning Roofing Plant 93 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Specialized Hospital 1,675 FTE
CITY-NEAR TheKey - NJ, Mountainside (1450 US-22) 400 FTE
CITY-NEAR Manor Care Health Services - Mountainside 184 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fine Group Inc 183 FTE
NAT-TCR Shreveport Purina Feed Mill 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR South Bay Solutions Inc 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Elizabethtown Ky 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Balfurd, Inc. 7.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Elsner Engineering Works, Inc. 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hunter Roberts Construction Group- PA 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Bellevue Manufacturing Co. 93 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schunk Xycarb Technology 93 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.