Annealing metals and metal products for the trade · New Jersey

Bodycote Thermal Processing - Roselle

Roselle, NJ · ~26 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bodycote Thermal Processing - Roselle runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Annealing metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade B.

Bodycote Thermal Processing - Roselle: 1.9 TCR = 57% of Annealing metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bodycote Thermal Processing - Roselle safety composite

Bodycote Thermal Processing - Roselle scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bodycote Thermal Processing - Roselle: 0.0 → 3.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.9 TCR · DART/TCR 2.04× in 2024

Bodycote Thermal Processing - Roselle's TCR rose 3.9 from 0.0 in 2016 to 3.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.04× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332811 · Roselle, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 57% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #1/4
  • PHOTO BodyCote Fort Wayne
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BodyCote Fort Wayne (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Bodycote Thermal Processing - Roselle in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bodycote Thermal Processing - Roselle averages 1.9 TCR (57% of the Annealing metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bodycote Thermal Processing - Roselle TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.7 · 2024=3.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Bodycote Thermal Processing - Roselle falls in its industry

248 Annealing metals and metal pro establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 Annealing metals and metal pro employers in New Jersey.

Bodycote Thermal Processing - Roselle (26 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Bodycote Thermal Processing - Roselle
Bodycote Thermal Processing - Roselle (26 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Bodycote Thermal Processing - Roselle has fewer employees than the Annealing metals and metal products for median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.9 3.9 1 0 0
2018 3.7 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332811 · NJ · Roselle

248 Annealing metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 15 employers in Roselle, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BodyCote Fort Wayne 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cincinnati Steel Treating 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atmosphere Annealing LLC, N. Vernon Facility 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Winston Heat Treating Inc 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Phoenix Diversified Group, Inc. 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kiely Pipeline Integrity 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rockborn Trucking & Excavation, Inc 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phoenix Marine Co.DE, LLC 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR On Time Transport 319 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2662-4070 159 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4070 EAST REGION-ROSELLE 132 FTE
CITY-NEAR Commercial Press East 67 FTE
NAT-TCR Brookdale Des Plaines 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Delmar Distributing Company 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Fox Hill Village Homeowners Corporation 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 284 - Kenosha WI 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sacramento Ca - 371 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meadville Pa - 078 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rochester Ny - 056 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wilmington De - 206 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.