Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · California

Bomar Mail & Courier Service LLC

Hayward, CA · ~30 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bomar Mail & Courier Service LLC runs at 209% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade F.

Bomar Mail & Courier Service LLC: 13.6 TCR = 209% of Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bomar Mail & Courier Service LLC safety composite

Bomar Mail & Courier Service LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 17.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bomar Mail & Courier Service LLC: 9.6 → 17.6 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 17.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.29× in 2018

Bomar Mail & Courier Service LLC's TCR rose 8.0 from 9.6 in 2017 to 17.6 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 1.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Hayward, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.6 · 209% of ind

  • DART 17.6 DART
  • RANK #475/710
  • PHOTO Amazon.com Services …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amazon.com Services LLC - DPD6 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Bomar Mail & Courier Service LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bomar Mail & Courier Service LLC averages 13.6 TCR (209% of the Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bomar Mail & Courier Service LLC TCR series: 2017=9.6 · 2018=17.6 · BLS 6.5

Where Bomar Mail & Courier Service LLC falls in its industry

6,679 Express delivery services (exc establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #475 safest of 710 Express delivery services (exc employers in California.

Bomar Mail & Courier Service LLC (30 employees, TCR 13.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Bomar Mail & Courier Service LLC
Bomar Mail & Courier Service LLC (30 employees, TCR 13.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Bomar Mail & Courier Service LLC has fewer employees than the Express delivery services (except establ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 17.6 17.6 2 0 0
2017 9.6 9.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · CA · Hayward

6,679 Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 336 employers in Hayward, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DPD6 13.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MIRACLE MILE DSP, LLC 13.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 152050000 13.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reynolds Mafia, Inc. 13.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE BZNUR 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1780 San Juan Rd. 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charter Oaks 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenfields Turf, Inc. 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 518 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 100 2,817 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 117 2,817 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Rose Hospital 929 FTE
NAT-TCR Site Amenities 13.6 TCR
NAT-TCR West Babylon ShopRite #835 13.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Pleasant View Home 13.6 TCR
NAT-TCR PBP 13.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE DBI Duval 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE UG2 -201 - CambridgeSide 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Med Life 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Action Resources - Charlotte 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.