Airport transit systems operation and maintenance · New York

Bombardier Transportation - New York - JFK

Jamaica, NY · ~201 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bombardier Transportation - New York - JFK runs at 23% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Airport transit systems operation and maintenance workplace, earning a grade A.

Bombardier Transportation - New York - JFK: 1.0 TCR = 23% of Airport transit systems operation and maintenance BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bombardier Transportation - New York - JFK safety composite

Bombardier Transportation - New York - JFK scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Bombardier Transportation - New York - JFK held a steady TCR band

Bombardier Transportation - New York - JFK's TCR held near 0.0 from 1.0 in 2016 to 1.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.0 TCR. In 2018, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.0 · 2017=1.0 · 2018=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488119 · Jamaica, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 23% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #9/111
  • PHOTO DGS Aviation Service…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~201 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DGS Aviation Services : PHL - Philadelphia (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Bombardier Transportation - New York - JFK in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bombardier Transportation - New York - JFK averages 1.0 TCR (23% of the Airport transit systems operation and maintenance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bombardier Transportation - New York - JFK TCR series: 2016=1 · 2017=1 · 2018=1 · BLS 4.5

Where Bombardier Transportation - New York - JFK falls in its industry

1,555 Airport transit systems operat establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 111 Airport transit systems operat employers in New York.

Bombardier Transportation - New York - JFK (201 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Bombardier Transportation - New York - JFK
Bombardier Transportation - New York - JFK (201 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Bombardier Transportation - New York - JFK has more employees than the Airport transit systems operation and ma median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.0 1.0 2 0 0
2017 1.0 1.0 2 0 0
2016 1.0 1.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488119 · NY · Jamaica

1,555 Airport transit systems operation and maintenance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 222 employers in Jamaica, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DGS Aviation Services : PHL - Philadelphia 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 00001351 ROA - 351 ROANOKE REGIONAL APT 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 00001087 TYS - 087 MCGHEE TYSON AIRPORT 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atlantic Aviation - PIT 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE International Chimney Corporation 201 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tioga Downs 201 FTE
STATE-SIZE ECD 201 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fairport Site 201 FTE
CITY-NEAR JFK Kennedy Airport 5,815 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jamaica Hospital Medical Center 3,801 FTE
CITY-NEAR JFKPW9832 JFK - PASSENGER SERV 3,637 FTE
CITY-NEAR DO & CO New York Catering Inc 1,694 FTE
NAT-TCR TX/NM - Baytown - 4215 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Nexeo Solutions - Denver 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cincinnatio, Ohio (Labs) 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR SPHS Corporate Office 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE OMI Environmental Solutions 201 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alvin Autoworld BDA Ron Carter Ford Inc 201 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heritage Health - Normal 201 FTE
NAT-SIZE US - Supply Chain : 0934 201 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.