Airport transit systems maintenance · Florida

Bombardier Transportation - Orlando - MCO

Orlando, FL · ~31 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bombardier Transportation - Orlando - MCO runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Airport transit systems maintenance workplace, earning a grade A.

Bombardier Transportation - Orlando - MCO: 1.0 TCR = 22% of Airport transit systems maintenance BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bombardier Transportation - Orlando - MCO safety composite

Bombardier Transportation - Orlando - MCO scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Bombardier Transportation - Orlando - MCO held a steady TCR band

Bombardier Transportation - Orlando - MCO's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.9 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488119 · Orlando, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 22% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/160
  • PHOTO TAC Air - LEX
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TAC Air - LEX (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Bombardier Transportation - Orlando - MCO in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bombardier Transportation - Orlando - MCO averages 1.0 TCR (22% of the Airport transit systems maintenance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bombardier Transportation - Orlando - MCO TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Bombardier Transportation - Orlando - MCO falls in its industry

1,555 Airport transit systems mainte establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 160 Airport transit systems mainte employers in Florida.

Bombardier Transportation - Orlando - MCO (31 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Bombardier Transportation - Orlando - MCO
Bombardier Transportation - Orlando - MCO (31 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Bombardier Transportation - Orlando - MCO has fewer employees than the Airport transit systems maintenance median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488119 · FL · Orlando

1,555 Airport transit systems maintenance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,997 employers in Orlando, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TAC Air - LEX 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR DGS Staffing Services : DSS Staffing Services 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR TAC Air - DAL 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR DGS Aviation Services : CAE - Columbia 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sun Ag LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wedgworth Farms, Inc Farms Shop 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fwest 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2406-Felda, FL 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Orlando Resort 20,343 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Parks and Resorts : UO 13,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADVENTHEALTH ORLANDO 11,412 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Hospital Orlando 10,318 FTE
NAT-TCR Greatbatch Ltd. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR AC Menards US 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Legends - Gorge Amphitheatre 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR HBSHSEMD26 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Action Resources - Cordele 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Element Houston 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woodstone Assisted Living 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Runnings DC of Rome NY 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.